
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs LAC: allows 18.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Geno Smith. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (95/489). Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 13% | 7% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 1 | -3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 18% | 3% | 0.9 | 0.4 | -0.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 31% | 15% | 6.4 | 4.9 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 7% | 3% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 16% | 3% | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 16% | 3% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 2% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 2 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 27% | 7% | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 2 | -3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 20% | 11% | 4.3 | 3.3 | 2.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 3.7 | RB66 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 3.1 | RB81 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 3.9 | RB69 (0.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 2.7 | RB40 (6.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 0.7 | RB38 (6.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 1.7 | RB75 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 2.1 | RB61 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 2.1 | RB58 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 1.8 | RB69 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 1.6 | RB57 (1.2) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade