
Why: heavy usage
vs PIT: allows 19.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 25/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W1 | vs | 18 | 68 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 43 | 0 | 16.1 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 15 | 33 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 84% | 10% | 7.3 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 22 | 195 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 34 | 1 | 79% | 40% | 39.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 16 | 76 | 0 | 11 | 7 | 92 | 1 | 70% | 33% | 29.8 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 19 | 93 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 82 | 0 | 90% | 27% | 29.5 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 20 | 86 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 67% | 7% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 23 | 142 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 51 | 0 | 87% | 23% | 30.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 14 | 70 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 0 | 66% | 10% | 14.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 23 | 104 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 39 | 0 | 85% | 17% | 30.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 17 | 84 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 86% | 8% | 10.8 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 12 | 46 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 50 | 0 | 96% | 29% | 17.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 9 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 60% | 10% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 14 | 40 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 52 | 1 | 88% | 22% | 21.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 19 | 170 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 68 | 0 | 74% | 26% | 35.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 17 | 75 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 106 | 0 | 69% | 19% | 28.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 13 | 72 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 39 | 0 | 80% | 15% | 16.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 22 | 143 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 65% | 24% | 19.8 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 12 | 24 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 100 | 1 | 83% | 17% | 24.4 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 28 | 170 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 87% | 14% | 31.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 20.8 | RB29 (7.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 19.4 | RB2 (39.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 18.8 | RB4 (29.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 17.4 | RB4 (29.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 18.1 | RB27 (9.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 17.3 | RB1 (30.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 15.9 | RB14 (14.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 15.9 | RB4 (30.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 17.5 | RB24 (10.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 17.6 | RB7 (17.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade