
Why: heavy usage
vs LAR: allows 20.2 PPR/g to RB, rank 21/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
And when you take those two things combined with an already good player, like that's when good becomes great, right?" Beane, who was then the director of football operations before he was promoted to assistant GM in 2015, compared it to the
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 8 | 23 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 34 | 0 | 86% | 28% | 11.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 23 | 140 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 85% | 19% | 28.1 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 21 | 117 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 29 | 2 | 80% | 24% | 32.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 22 | 73 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 84% | 4% | 15.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 20 | 53 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 79% | 19% | 17.4 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 24 | 89 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 53 | 0 | 83% | 22% | 27.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 13 | 81 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 40 | 1 | 71% | 26% | 35.1 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 12 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 66 | 0 | 78% | 27% | 17.6 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 28 | 106 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 67 | 1 | 86% | 29% | 34.3 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 8 | 25 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 43 | 0 | 96% | 21% | 9.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 24 | 129 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 72 | 0 | 75% | 36% | 39.1 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 17 | 54 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 57 | 0 | 93% | 22% | 24.1 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 22 | 57 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 82 | 1 | 88% | 21% | 27.9 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 17 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 92 | 1 | 85% | 32% | 26.1 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 17 | 52 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 88 | 0 | 91% | 41% | 24.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 13 | 55 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 52 | 1 | 77% | 19% | 22.7 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 22 | 69 | 0 | 10 | 9 | 73 | 0 | 76% | 31% | 23.2 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 7 | 53 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 25% | 18% | 8.7 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 21 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 19.8 | RB18 (11.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 20.4 | RB4 (28.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 19.9 | RB2 (32.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 20.2 | RB14 (15.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 20.7 | RB12 (17.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 20.8 | RB2 (27.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 21.1 | RB1 (35.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 21.1 | RB10 (17.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 21.4 | RB1 (34.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 21.7 | RB25 (9.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade