
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
vs SF: allows 17.1 PPR/g to QB, rank 14/32 (Average). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (5 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
(He inherited Jared Goff, and in 2021 the Rams traded for Matthew Stafford.) Time will tell what Simpson will become.
source ↗| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 25/40 | 259 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 26.7 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 22/38 | 269 | 2 | 3 | – | – | 12.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 29/49 | 457 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 30.9 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 24/38 | 368 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 20.9 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 22/31 | 281 | 3 | 0 | – | – | 23.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 18/28 | 243 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 11.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 25/35 | 273 | 3 | 0 | – | – | 22.9 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 15/28 | 130 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 13.2 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 24/36 | 280 | 4 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 26.9 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 24/32 | 281 | 4 | 0 | -4 | 0 | 26.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 21/33 | 182 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 27.4 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 17/26 | 181 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9.3 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 30/47 | 389 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.6 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 29/41 | 375 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 27.4 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 19/33 | 196 | 2 | 1 | – | – | 13.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 23/33 | 298 | 2 | 1 | -6 | 0 | 17.3 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 21/29 | 245 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 13.6 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 17/32 | 189 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 9.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 19.3 | QB2 (26.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 18.3 | QB19 (12.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 15.1 | QB3 (30.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 17.6 | QB11 (20.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 18.2 | QB4 (23.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 18.9 | QB23 (11.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 19.6 | QB5 (22.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 18.9 | QB15 (13.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 19.1 | QB2 (26.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 19.7 | QB7 (26.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade