
Why: projected outside startable range
vs NE: allows 28.7 PPR/g to WR, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W11 | @ | 10 | 6 | 106 | 2 | 28.6 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 77% | 12% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 88% | 12% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 4 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 93% | 13% | 6.9 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 7 | 5 | 46 | 0 | 75% | 22% | 9.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 3 | 2 | 35 | 1 | 69% | 10% | 11.5 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 76% | 17% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 4 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 77% | 16% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 7 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 81% | 17% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 2 | 2 | 74 | 0 | 53% | 17% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 1 | 1 | 32 | 0 | 75% | 3% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 3 | 2 | 40 | 1 | 71% | 13% | 12.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 9 | 6 | 59 | 0 | 88% | 27% | 11.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 5 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 74% | 21% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 3 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 54% | 15% | 5.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 9 | 7 | 90 | 0 | 69% | 30% | 16.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 3 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 88% | 14% | 3.5 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 3 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 84% | 11% | 3.9 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 3 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 77% | 16% | 5.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 28 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 8.7 | WR57 (4.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 9.0 | WR104 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.6 | WR58 (6.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 8.7 | WR40 (9.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.4 | WR23 (11.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.6 | WR61 (5.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 7.8 | WR60 (4.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 8.4 | WR59 (5.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.1 | WR36 (9.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 9.3 | WR93 (2.2) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade