
Why: projected outside startable range
vs HOU: allows 25.5 PPR/g to WR, rank 31/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W5 | @ | 5 | 1 | 49 | 1 | 11.9 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
On offense, we can debate whether wide receiver Keon Coleman is out of the coaching staff's good graces, but he still has room to develop because he's only 23 years old after two seasons.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 4 | 2 | 49 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 15% | 8.9 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | – | – | 28% | 11% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 3 | 2 | 9 | 1 | – | – | 45% | 13% | 8.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 8 | 3 | 46 | 1 | – | – | 62% | 21% | 13.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 8% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 4 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 17% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 6 | 3 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 23% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 7 | 4 | 23 | 1 | – | – | 62% | 23% | 10.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 4 | 3 | 45 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 18% | 7.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 15% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 3 | 3 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 12% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 11 | 8 | 112 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 24% | 25.2 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 10 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 97% | 32% | 6.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 7 | 3 | 27 | 1 | – | – | 90% | 26% | 11.7 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 2 | 1 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 7% | 2.7 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 2 | 1 | 64 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 6% | 7.4 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 2 | 1 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 6% | 5.1 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 24 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 6.6 | WR32 (8.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.5 | WR154 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.8 | WR69 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 8.8 | WR40 (8.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.1 | WR25 (13.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 9.5 | WR65 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 9.6 | WR57 (6.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 8.7 | WR74 (4.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 10.4 | WR44 (10.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | FLEX | 12.0 | WR49 (7.5) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade