
Why: heavy usage
vs DET: allows 19.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 24/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W11 | @ | 12 | 27 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6.3 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 14 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 56% | 3% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 17 | 76 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 70% | 8% | 11.2 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 16 | 50 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 70% | 14% | 16.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 12 | 32 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 73 | 3 | 61% | 14% | 31.5 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 20 | 74 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 72% | 3% | 21.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 12 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 49% | 4% | 5.1 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 15 | 86 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 65% | 13% | 20.6 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 19 | 73 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49% | 9% | 19.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 16 | 58 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 56% | 17% | 15.7 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 22 | 84 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 31 | 0 | 58% | 15% | 16.5 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 8 | 44 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 55% | 6% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 12 | 27 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 62% | 12% | 9.5 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 12 | 49 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 59% | 16% | 8.8 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 19 | 124 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 60% | 7% | 19.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 16 | 56 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54% | 5% | 11.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 14 | 71 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 66% | 7% | 16.9 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 16 | 143 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 61% | 10% | 18.6 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 13 | 31 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 43% | 16% | 9.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 17.5 | RB47 (4.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 15.9 | RB20 (11.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 15.3 | RB18 (16.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 15.1 | RB1 (31.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 13.2 | RB5 (21.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 15.1 | RB52 (5.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 13.7 | RB7 (20.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 12.0 | RB11 (19.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 10.9 | RB13 (15.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 12.1 | RB12 (16.5) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade