Loading…
Blake Corum
RB · LAR
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
26.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs SF: allows 23.5 PPR/g to RB, rank 10/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs SF
contextvs SF: 4 games, 2.7 PPR avg
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %33%
Target share3%
Opportunities14
Signal · descriptiveOpportunity rising, production lagging (last-3-week opportunities up vs the prior three while fantasy output hasn’t followed. Often a buy-low pattern.)
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
103Easy
#3 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
96Hard
#24 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
103Easy
#3 of 32 · 17 games
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Mock draft: Non-PPR formats are a throwback to run...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
- Mock draft: 12-team league can shift your quarterb...www.espn.com · 2026-07-13
- Fantasy football: Players to upgrade, downgrade du...www.espn.com · 2026-07-10
- Barnwell presents the 'Domestic Cup of American Fo...www.espn.com · 2026-07-02
- Mock draft: Why rushing yards, deep threats matter...www.espn.com · 2026-06-29
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs ARI | 13 | 59 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 33% | 3% | 7.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ ATL | 6 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ SEA | 14 | 48 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 29% | 4% | 13.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs DET | 11 | 71 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46% | 0% | 13.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @ARI | 12 | 128 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 31% | 3% | 26.1 |
| 2025 W13 | @ CAR | 7 | 81 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 0% | 14.1 |
| 2025 W12 | vs TB | 7 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34% | 0% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W11 | vsSEA | 8 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -5 | 0 | 31% | 7% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ SF | 13 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39% | 0% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs NO | 13 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 0% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ JAX | 12 | 37 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 34% | 3% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W6 | @ BAL | 5 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23% | 0% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W5 | vsSF | 1 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 4% | 1.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs IND | 9 | 21 | 0 | 4 | 2 | -5 | 0 | 29% | 10% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ PHI | 8 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24% | 0% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W2 | @ TEN | 5 | 44 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 0% | 10.4 |
| 2025 W1 | vs HOU | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 17% | 4% | 2.6 |
| 2024 W18 | vsSEA | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 18% | 3% | 3.2 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim84%hit rate
32 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 33%
of 3 Flex calls
🔴 90%
of 29 Sit calls
Based on 32 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | ARI | FLEX | 11.5 | RB27 (7.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | ATL | FLEX | 12.0 | RB64 (1.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | SEA | FLEX | 9.9 | RB22 (13.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | DET | SIT | 9.5 | RB20 (13.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W14 | ARI | SIT | 8.2 | RB3 (26.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | CAR | SIT | 7.4 | RB19 (14.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W12 | TB | SIT | 7.4 | RB50 (2.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | SEA | SIT | 7.0 | RB61 (1.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | SF | SIT | 5.8 | RB40 (5.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | NO | SIT | 5.9 | RB35 (5.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade