
Why: limited usage
vs NYG: allows 33.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (5 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 16% | 5% | 0.7 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 1 | 1 | 86 | 1 | – | – | 17% | 3% | 15.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 4 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 31% | 13% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 20% | 6% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 52% | 4% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 33 | 36% | 5% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 2 | 1 | 48 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 47% | 6% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 7% | 1.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 19% | 8% | 3.3 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 5 | 1 | -2 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 14% | 0.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 30% | 3% | 2.7 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 4 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 61% | 11% | 6.4 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 3 | 2 | 64 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 66% | 7% | 8.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 4 | 4 | 47 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 16% | 8% | 15.3 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 46% | 6% | 4.7 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 5 | 3 | 53 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 50% | 15% | 8.8 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 4 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 53% | 14% | 4.4 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 42% | 3% | 2.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 5.6 | WR103 (0.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 6.1 | WR14 (15.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 5.2 | WR74 (4.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 5.2 | WR82 (3.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 5.1 | WR56 (5.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.8 | WR43 (8.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 4.0 | WR63 (4.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 5.3 | WR101 (1.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.3 | WR68 (3.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 6.3 | WR93 (0.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade