
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs KC: allows 27.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 21/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Daniel Jones. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (310/521). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR103), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W12 | @ | 1 | 1 | 48 | 0 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 4.8 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 3% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 37% | 6% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 12% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 1 | 1 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 18% | 3% | 5.8 | 5.3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 19% | 0% | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 8% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 1 | 1 | -8 | 0 | – | – | 25% | 4% | 0.2 | -0.3 | -0.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 5 | 2 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 17% | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 20% | 3% | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 16% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 14% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 14% | 0% | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 10% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 8% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 15% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 18% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 23% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 0.5 | WR123 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 1.8 | WR129 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 1.0 | WR50 (5.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 3.4 | WR80 (2.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 3.9 | WR113 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 4.0 | WR95 (0.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 3.7 | WR112 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 1.8 | WR56 (7.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 0.9 | WR89 (2.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W3 | SIT | 0.9 | WR131 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade