
Why: projected outside startable range
vs KC: allows 27.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 21/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Daniel Jones. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (310/521). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR55), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
According to multiple reports Monday night, the Colts have agreed to terms with veteran free agent receiver Keenan Allen on a one-year contract potentially worth more than $8 million. Reports: Colts signing Keenan Allen to add depth to rece
source ↗According to multiple reports Monday night, the Colts have agreed to terms with veteran free agent receiver Keenan Allen on a one-year contract potentially worth more than $8 million. Reports: Colts signing Keenan Allen to add depth to rece
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 6 | 6 | 32 | 0 | 0% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 13 | 7 | 36 | 0 | 54% | 34% | 10.6 | 7.1 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 57% | 10% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 5 | 44 | 0 | 47% | 18% | 9.4 | 6.9 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 7 | 5 | 36 | 0 | 42% | 30% | 8.6 | 6.1 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 57% | 13% | 5.2 | 3.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 5 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 60% | 24% | 7.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 6 | 4 | 53 | 0 | 75% | 25% | 9.3 | 7.3 | 5.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 5 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 51% | 15% | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 5 | 2 | 41 | 0 | 37% | 19% | 6.1 | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 5 | 4 | 44 | 0 | 25% | 21% | 8.4 | 6.4 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 14 | 11 | 119 | 1 | 64% | 26% | 28.9 | 23.4 | 17.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 7 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 56% | 18% | 6.7 | 4.7 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 9 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 58% | 28% | 10.8 | 8.3 | 5.8 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 7 | 5 | 37 | 0 | 78% | 19% | 8.7 | 6.2 | 3.7 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 11 | 7 | 65 | 1 | 65% | 24% | 19.5 | 16.0 | 12.5 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 7 | 5 | 61 | 1 | 55% | 26% | 17.1 | 14.6 | 12.1 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 10 | 7 | 68 | 1 | 62% | 29% | 19.8 | 16.3 | 12.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 6.5 | WR23 (10.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 8.5 | WR88 (2.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 9.5 | WR38 (9.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.8 | WR44 (8.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.4 | WR53 (5.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 8.6 | WR48 (7.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 10.3 | WR37 (9.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 10.9 | WR61 (3.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 12.4 | WR55 (6.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 12.7 | WR48 (8.4) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade