Loading…
Noah Gray
TE · KC
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.6
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs DEN: allows 13.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 14/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs DEN
contextvs DEN: 6 games, 2.8 PPR avg
Small sample (6 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %56%
Target share17%
Opportunities5
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
100Average
#13 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
98Average
#20 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
100Average
#13 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ LV | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 17% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs DEN | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 5% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W16 | @ TEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs HOU | 3 | 1 | 14 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 10% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W12 | vs IND | 4 | 3 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 32% | 9% | 5.5 |
| 2025 W11 | @DEN | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 7% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W9 | @ BUF | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 37% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs WSH | 4 | 2 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 13% | 4.3 |
| 2025 W7 | vsLV | 1 | 1 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 3% | 3.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs DET | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 7% | 4.5 |
| 2025 W5 | @ JAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs BAL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 3% | 1.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ NYG | 6 | 3 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 17% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W2 | vs PHI | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 17% | 1.1 |
| 2025 W1 | @LAC | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 3% | 1.3 |
| 2024 W18 | @DEN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 12% | 6% | 0.7 |
| 2024 W17 | @ PIT | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 3% | 1.6 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim91%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 100%
of 1 Flex call
🔴 91%
of 32 Sit calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade