
Why: projected outside startable range
vs CIN: allows 25.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer C.J. Stroud. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (345/551). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR53), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W12 | @ | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Or is it a fait accompli that someone such as Kayshon Boutte -- a 2025 starter with a knack for tracking the deep ball who has been pushed down the depth chart -- gets traded to a receiver-needy team?
source ↗Texans Houston traded for WR Kayshon Boutte to step into a regular role after losing WR Jayden Higgins to a season-ending injury. AFC Notes: Kayshon Boutte, Cam Ward, Jaguars, Texans, Titans
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 2 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 0% | 5% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 4 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 58% | 20% | 4.4 | 3.4 | 2.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 3 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 58% | 7% | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 1 | 30 | 0 | 75% | 5% | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 5 | 4 | 35 | 1 | 75% | 17% | 13.5 | 11.5 | 9.5 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 80% | 6% | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 5 | 3 | 75 | 1 | 74% | 22% | 16.5 | 15.0 | 13.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 2 | 55 | 1 | 71% | 8% | 13.5 | 12.5 | 11.5 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 5 | 5 | 93 | 2 | 67% | 21% | 26.3 | 23.8 | 21.3 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 3 | 3 | 43 | 0 | 62% | 11% | 7.3 | 5.8 | 4.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 3 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 69% | 18% | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 3 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 76% | 8% | 4.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 1 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 72% | 4% | 8.6 | 8.1 | 7.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 8 | 6 | 103 | 0 | 82% | 18% | 16.3 | 13.3 | 10.3 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 7 | 7 | 117 | 1 | 70% | 25% | 24.7 | 21.2 | 17.7 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 5 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 77% | 22% | 6.8 | 4.8 | 2.8 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 7 | 5 | 95 | 1 | 88% | 23% | 20.5 | 18.0 | 15.5 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 29 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 7.0 | WR63 (4.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 5.6 | WR92 (2.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.4 | WR76 (4.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.3 | WR22 (13.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 9.6 | WR68 (3.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 10.5 | WR126 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 9.0 | WR13 (16.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 8.6 | WR24 (13.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 6.6 | WR4 (26.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 7.6 | WR57 (7.3) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade