Loading…
Drew Sample
TE · CIN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
27.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs TB: allows 15.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 6/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs TB
contextNo prior games vs TB in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %72%
Target share8%
Opportunities3
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
103Easy
#10 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
103Average
#16 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
103Easy
#10 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs CLE | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 72% | 8% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vs ARI | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ MIA | 2 | 2 | 31 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 7% | 5.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs BAL | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 6% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @BAL | 2 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 59% | 5% | 2.7 |
| 2025 W12 | vs NE | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 52% | 3% | 1.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs NYJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vsPIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ GB | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 5% | 0.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vs DET | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 3% | 0.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ DEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ MIN | 3 | 2 | 20 | 1 | – | – | 68% | 12% | 10.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs JAX | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 5% | 1.7 |
| 2025 W1 | @CLE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 69% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @PIT | 4 | 4 | 14 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 9% | 5.4 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim94%hit rate
34 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 94%
of 34 Sit calls
Based on 34 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | CLE | SIT | 3.5 | TE34 (4.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | ARI | SIT | 3.8 | TE47 (1.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | MIA | SIT | 3.2 | TE30 (5.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | BAL | SIT | 2.3 | TE43 (3.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | BUF | SIT | 2.3 | TE63 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | BAL | SIT | 1.7 | TE43 (2.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | NE | SIT | 1.4 | TE56 (1.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | PIT | SIT | 1.8 | TE60 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | CHI | SIT | 2.0 | TE61 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | NYJ | SIT | 2.0 | TE51 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade