
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
vs NO: allows 27.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 22/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W13 | @ | 6 | 2 | 49 | 1 | 12.9 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 15 | 11 | 139 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 42% | 24.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 13 | 8 | 68 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 45% | 14.8 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 9 | 4 | 54 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 17% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 18 | 13 | 164 | 2 | – | – | 95% | 47% | 41.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 9 | 6 | 92 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 29% | 15.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 6% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 13 | 9 | 149 | 1 | – | – | 97% | 34% | 29.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 12 | 2 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 33% | 6.2 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 8 | 5 | 58 | 1 | – | – | 77% | 25% | 16.8 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 13 | 9 | 97 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 36% | 18.7 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 10 | 6 | 86 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 36% | 20.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 10 | 9 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 89% | 37% | 13.7 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 9 | 8 | 100 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 39% | 18.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 7 | 7 | 70 | 2 | – | – | 90% | 28% | 26.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 8 | 7 | 77 | 1 | – | – | 85% | 31% | 20.7 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 11 | 9 | 115 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 85% | 39% | 39.2 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 6 | 4 | 45 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 16% | 8.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 7 | 6 | 77 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 22% | 13.7 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 18.0 | WR4 (24.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 14.1 | WR16 (14.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 16.7 | WR39 (9.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 12.9 | WR1 (41.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 13.2 | WR17 (15.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 16.9 | WR136 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 16.8 | WR3 (29.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 16.1 | WR53 (6.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 17.6 | WR18 (16.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 17.3 | WR11 (18.7) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade