
Why: projected outside startable range
vs MIN: allows 23.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs | 6 | 5 | 113 | 1 | – | – | 62% | 24% | 22.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 6 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 25% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 5 | 3 | 29 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 14% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 4 | 4 | 89 | 2 | – | – | 83% | 17% | 24.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 10 | 4 | 80 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 73% | 35% | 18.3 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 7 | 5 | 49 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 33% | 9.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 5 | 4 | 46 | 2 | – | – | 78% | 20% | 20.6 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 4 | 2 | 45 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 12% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 4 | 2 | 58 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 11% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 4 | 4 | 85 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 11% | 12.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 15% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 43% | 4% | 2.3 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 6 | 3 | 56 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 23% | 8.6 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 7 | 4 | 114 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 37% | 13.4 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 4 | 2 | 67 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 14% | 8.7 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 65% | 14% | 0.4 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 4 | 4 | 150 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 24% | 19.0 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 7 | 3 | 37 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 19% | 8.7 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 11.1 | WR5 (22.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 12.2 | WR83 (3.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 13.6 | WR60 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 12.6 | WR6 (24.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 10.2 | WR12 (18.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 9.3 | WR33 (9.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.6 | WR6 (20.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 5.4 | WR47 (6.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.6 | WR49 (7.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.8 | WR29 (12.5) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade