
Why: form-driven
vs TEN: allows 21.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 17/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 | @ | 14 | 62 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 52 | 1 | 24.4 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs | 14 | 111 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 48% | 10% | 20.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 16 | 54 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 64% | 9% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 12 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 54% | 7% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 14 | 43 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76% | 3% | 4.3 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 19 | 68 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 88% | 7% | 15.6 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 16 | 44 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 75 | 0 | 71% | 15% | 13.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 14 | 58 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 72% | 8% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 21 | 83 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 1 | 71% | 9% | 19.5 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 18 | 133 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 56% | 10% | 32.9 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 11 | 38 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 54% | 10% | 7.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 22 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74% | 0% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 14 | 113 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 62% | 12% | 17.5 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 14 | 81 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 63% | 22% | 16.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 9 | 21 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 55% | 17% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 10 | 29 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 64% | 14% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 19 | 107 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 38 | 0 | 58% | 19% | 16.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 12 | 57 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 1 | 70% | 14% | 18.2 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 10 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 49% | 3% | 6.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 11.0 | RB9 (20.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 12.1 | RB38 (8.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 12.3 | RB43 (5.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 14.6 | RB46 (4.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 15.2 | RB17 (15.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 13.6 | RB15 (13.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 13.6 | RB33 (8.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 13.3 | RB7 (19.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 12.5 | RB4 (32.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 13.2 | RB30 (7.2) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade