
Why: projected outside startable range
vs DEN: allows 13.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 14/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Trevor Lawrence. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (102/539). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE21), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | @ | 7 | 5 | 39 | 1 | 14.9 | 12.4 | 9.9 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 3 | 2 | 23 | 1 | 0% | 14% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 6 | 6 | 52 | 1 | 62% | 19% | 17.2 | 14.2 | 11.2 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 5 | 3 | 54 | 0 | 81% | 14% | 8.4 | 6.9 | 5.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 7 | 5 | 39 | 1 | 74% | 20% | 14.9 | 12.4 | 9.9 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 3 | 1 | 26 | 0 | 82% | 11% | 3.6 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 6 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 80% | 19% | 5.7 | 4.2 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 4 | 3 | 45 | 1 | 84% | 16% | 13.5 | 12.0 | 10.5 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 5 | 5 | 93 | 0 | 71% | 17% | 14.3 | 11.8 | 9.3 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 38% | 4% | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 7 | 6 | 45 | 0 | 74% | 23% | 10.5 | 7.5 | 4.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 7 | 6 | 61 | 0 | 83% | 18% | 12.1 | 9.1 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 5 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 90% | 12% | 4.7 | 3.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 4 | 4 | 59 | 0 | 79% | 14% | 9.9 | 7.9 | 5.9 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 4 | 4 | 60 | 0 | 72% | 13% | 10.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72% | 5% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 51% | 11% | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 12 | 11 | 73 | 0 | 82% | 28% | 18.3 | 12.8 | 7.3 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 44% | 3% | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 29 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 8.8 | TE5 (17.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 9.1 | TE20 (8.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.6 | TE9 (14.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.9 | TE40 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.2 | TE21 (5.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 8.4 | TE7 (13.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 7.9 | TE4 (14.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W5 | FLEX | 9.2 | TE39 (3.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 8.4 | TE16 (10.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W3 | SIT | 6.7 | TE7 (12.1) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade