
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs MIA: allows 18.3 PPR/g to QB, rank 10/32 (Soft). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (QB18), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W16 | @ | 26/40 | 313 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 0 | 21.1 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
“I don’t know if I’m worth three first-round picks, but shit, sign me up.” No one traded for Jones this offseason, so he will remain Brock Purdy’s backup this season in the final year of his contract.
source ↗“I don’t know if I’m worth three first-round picks, but shit, sign me up.” No one traded for Jones this offseason, so he will remain Brock Purdy’s backup this season in the final year of his contract.
source ↗| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 25/34 | 205 | 3 | 1 | 29 | 0 | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 19/27 | 127 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 5.2 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 24/33 | 303 | 3 | 1 | 28 | 2 | 36.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 25/34 | 295 | 5 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 30.9 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 23/30 | 295 | 3 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 26.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 16/29 | 168 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 17.1 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 23/32 | 193 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 7.3 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 19/26 | 200 | 3 | 0 | -7 | 0 | 19.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 22/38 | 309 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 17.7 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 26/35 | 277 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 16.8 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 27/35 | 377 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 30.3 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 26/40 | 313 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 0 | 21.1 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 14/31 | 142 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 20/25 | 325 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 22.1 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 11/18 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2.2 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 21/28 | 159 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 18.4 |
| 2024 W10 | @ | 25/36 | 353 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 23.8 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 18/26 | 260 | 1 | 0 | 56 | 1 | 26.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 24 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 19.5 | QB29 (5.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 19.0 | QB1 (36.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 17.3 | QB2 (30.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 17.3 | QB5 (26.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 15.0 | QB13 (17.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 18.7 | QB23 (7.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 18.6 | QB6 (19.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | FLEX | 17.1 | QB15 (17.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W1 | FLEX | 16.7 | QB15 (16.8) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W17 | SIT | 15.0 | QB5 (30.3) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade