Loading…
CeeDee Lamb
WR · DAL
FLEX
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
25.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs NYG: allows 33.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs NYG
contextvs NYG: 6 games, 17.1 PPR avg
Small sample (6 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %45%
Target share5%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
104Easy
#4 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
107Easy
#5 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
104Easy
#4 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Ranking the NFL’s highest-graded players in primetimewww.pff.com · 2026-07-28
- 2026 Fantasy Football: Tight ends to avoid in draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-24
- Quieter offseason has Cowboys focused on the right...www.espn.com · 2026-07-24
- NFL Trade Rumors Top 100 Players: 20-11nfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-23
- Queipo’s Cover 4: Finding A Vet CB For The Bucs, Chris Godwin Jr. Dilemmawww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-22
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ NYG | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 5% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ WSH | 10 | 5 | 46 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 29% | 9.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs LAC | 7 | 6 | 51 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 23% | 11.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs MIN | 10 | 6 | 111 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 30% | 17.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @ DET | 8 | 6 | 121 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 17% | 18.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs KC | 9 | 7 | 112 | 1 | – | – | 81% | 24% | 24.2 |
| 2025 W12 | vs PHI | 11 | 4 | 75 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 32% | 11.5 |
| 2025 W11 | @ LV | 7 | 5 | 66 | 1 | – | – | 73% | 24% | 17.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs ARI | 12 | 7 | 85 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 33% | 15.5 |
| 2025 W8 | @ DEN | 10 | 7 | 74 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 72% | 29% | 14.6 |
| 2025 W7 | vsWSH | 8 | 5 | 110 | 1 | – | – | 78% | 28% | 22.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vsNYG | 11 | 9 | 112 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 21% | 20.2 |
| 2025 W1 | @PHI | 13 | 7 | 110 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 39% | 18.0 |
| 2024 W16 | vs TB | 8 | 7 | 105 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 26% | 17.5 |
| 2024 W15 | @ CAR | 13 | 9 | 116 | 1 | – | – | 70% | 46% | 26.6 |
| 2024 W14 | vs CIN | 7 | 6 | 93 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 97% | 23% | 21.4 |
| 2024 W13 | vsNYG | 6 | 2 | 39 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 17% | 5.9 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim69%hit rate
29 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 61%
of 23 Start calls
🟡 100%
of 6 Flex calls
Based on 29 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | NYG | START | 13.5 | WR98 (1.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | WSH | START | 14.5 | WR37 (9.6) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | LAC | START | 14.7 | WR31 (11.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | MIN | START | 14.2 | WR15 (17.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | DET | START | 15.4 | WR10 (18.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | KC | START | 14.8 | WR5 (24.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | PHI | START | 14.8 | WR28 (11.5) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | LV | FLEX | 12.0 | WR14 (17.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | ARI | FLEX | 12.0 | WR22 (15.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | DEN | FLEX | 12.5 | WR18 (14.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade