
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs DEN: allows 16.9 PPR/g to RB, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Trevor Lawrence. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (78/539). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB89), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 4 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 12% | 6% | 4.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 9% | 3% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 7% | 3% | -0.6 | -1.1 | -1.6 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 4 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 23% | 19% | 9.7 | 7.2 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 24% | 6% | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 6% | 4% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6% | 2% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 19% | 4% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8% | 3% | 3.7 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 5% | 3% | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 6.6 | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 20 | 115 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 62% | 11% | 17.7 | 16.2 | 14.7 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 7 | 38 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 47 | 0 | 43% | 16% | 19.5 | 17.0 | 14.5 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 3 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 58 | 1 | 46% | 21% | 19.6 | 16.1 | 12.6 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 39% | 6% | 0.8 | 0.3 | -0.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 29 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.2 | RB50 (4.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 3.3 | RB65 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 3.2 | RB90 (-0.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 0.9 | RB29 (9.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 1.7 | RB56 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 2.2 | RB74 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 2.3 | RB60 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 3.2 | RB54 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 3.8 | RB56 (1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.4 | RB52 (1.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade