
Why: OUT · INJ gate
vs DAL: allows 24.9 PPR/g to RB, rank 6/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Marcus Mariota. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (55/426). Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Running back Jeremy McNichols will miss at least a couple of weeks with a quad injury, according to coach Dan Quinn.
source ↗Running back Jeremy McNichols will miss at least a couple of weeks with a quad injury, according to coach Dan Quinn.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 22% | 5% | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 1 | -2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 41% | 14% | 4.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 28% | 15% | 5.2 | 4.2 | 3.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 9 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 49% | 6% | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 35% | 5% | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 6 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 49% | 4% | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 4 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 25% | 7% | 4.9 | 3.9 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 5 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 31% | 5% | 3.9 | 3.4 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 64 | 0 | 43% | 20% | 11.8 | 9.3 | 6.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 22 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 36% | 10% | 6.5 | 5.5 | 4.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 32% | 17% | 6.5 | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 25% | 9% | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 8% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 4 | 78 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 13.8 | 13.8 | 13.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 4 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 4.9 | RB62 (2.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 5.9 | RB44 (4.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 5.4 | RB49 (5.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 6.0 | RB66 (1.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 5.3 | RB63 (1.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 5.4 | RB53 (5.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.3 | RB44 (4.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.0 | RB45 (3.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.9 | RB66 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 4.8 | RB20 (11.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade