
Why: projected outside startable range
vs DAL: allows 12.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Theo Johnson, New York Giants With Isaiah Likely joining the Giants, Johnson will likely get demoted to being New York’s No.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96% | 15% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 4 | 3 | 72 | 0 | 87% | 11% | 10.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 8 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 89% | 33% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 5 | 3 | 77 | 0 | 78% | 15% | 10.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 4 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 92% | 14% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 8 | 7 | 75 | 0 | 97% | 25% | 14.5 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 6 | 3 | 27 | 1 | 86% | 19% | 11.7 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 98% | 18% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 7 | 3 | 66 | 1 | 88% | 21% | 15.6 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 4 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 90% | 15% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 7 | 6 | 33 | 2 | 82% | 18% | 21.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 5 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 70% | 25% | 10.7 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 86% | 7% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 5 | 4 | 34 | 0 | 84% | 13% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 78% | 9% | 1.5 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 5 | 5 | 54 | 0 | 89% | 16% | 10.4 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 6 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 73% | 20% | 6.9 |
| 2024 W10 | @ | 6 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 92% | 19% | 7.7 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 9.2 | TE96 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 10.7 | TE14 (10.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 9.9 | TE27 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 9.8 | TE11 (10.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 10.8 | TE22 (6.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 9.6 | TE7 (14.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 10.1 | TE12 (11.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 10.4 | TE24 (5.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 8.7 | TE9 (15.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 8.6 | TE33 (4.7) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade