Loading…
James Cook III
RB · BUF
FLEX
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: form-driven
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
23.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs HOU: allows 19.5 PPR/g to RB, rank 23/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs HOU
contextvs HOU: 2 games, 19.9 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %3%
Target share0%
Opportunities2
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
99Average
#22 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
95Hard
#27 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
99Average
#22 of 32 · 17 games
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Top Free Agent Landing Spots For RB Nick Chubbnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-27
- NFL Trade Rumors Top 100 Players: 10-1nfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-24
- Fernando Mendoza, Tyler Shough top NFLPA's Rising Stars listwww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-21
- AFC Notes: Josh Allen, Cade Klubnik, Dion Dawkins, Bills, Jetsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-20
- Mock draft: Non-PPR formats are a throwback to run...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs NYJ | 2 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W17 | vs PHI | 20 | 74 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 51% | 12% | 8.7 |
| 2025 W16 | @ CLE | 16 | 117 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 56% | 11% | 26.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ NE | 22 | 107 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 67% | 12% | 31.1 |
| 2025 W14 | vs CIN | 18 | 80 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 75% | 7% | 11.1 |
| 2025 W13 | @ PIT | 32 | 144 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 61% | 13% | 18.7 |
| 2025 W12 | @ HOU | 17 | 116 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 55% | 10% | 21.9 |
| 2025 W11 | vs TB | 16 | 48 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 66 | 1 | 66% | 10% | 20.4 |
| 2025 W10 | @ MIA | 13 | 53 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 0 | 50% | 13% | 10.7 |
| 2025 W9 | vs KC | 27 | 114 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 76% | 4% | 13.5 |
| 2025 W8 | @ CAR | 19 | 216 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44% | 0% | 33.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @ ATL | 17 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53% | 0% | 8.7 |
| 2025 W5 | vsNE | 15 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72% | 3% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W4 | vs NO | 22 | 117 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 73% | 18% | 22.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vsMIA | 19 | 108 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 67% | 11% | 20.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @NYJ | 21 | 132 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 47% | 4% | 26.5 |
| 2025 W1 | vs BAL | 13 | 44 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 56% | 11% | 21.2 |
| 2024 W18 | @NE | 10 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | 8.8 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim70%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 56%
of 18 Start calls
🟡 87%
of 15 Flex calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | NYJ | START | 16.6 | RB68 (1.5) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | PHI | START | 17.4 | RB25 (8.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | CLE | START | 17.2 | RB6 (26.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | NE | START | 16.2 | RB2 (31.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | CIN | START | 16.4 | RB25 (11.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | PIT | FLEX | 14.9 | RB9 (18.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | HOU | START | 15.8 | RB6 (21.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | TB | START | 14.6 | RB7 (20.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | MIA | START | 15.1 | RB25 (10.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W9 | KC | START | 15.0 | RB13 (13.5) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade