
Why: projected outside startable range




vs DET: allows 18.2 PPR/g to QB, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (QB4), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W15 | @ | 23/34 | 362 | 2 | 0 | 68 | 2 | 41.3 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Broncos Broncos OC Davis Webb was reminded about his time with the Bills when the team traded for WR Stefon Diggs to pair with QB Josh Allen, given that Denver traded for WR Jaylen Waddle to pair with QB Bo Nix. “There are some similarities
source ↗Buffalo does have one of the league’s best quarterbacks in Josh Allen and continuity on offense with former coordinator Joe Brady getting promoted to head coach.
source ↗| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 20/29 | 334 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 2 | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 23/35 | 262 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 2 | 23.2 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 12/19 | 130 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 6.9 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 19/28 | 193 | 3 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 24.5 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 22/28 | 251 | 3 | 0 | 78 | 1 | 37.8 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 15/23 | 123 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 1 | 16.7 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 24/34 | 253 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 8.1 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 19/30 | 317 | 3 | 2 | 40 | 3 | 42.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 28/40 | 306 | 2 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 19.3 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 23/26 | 273 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 28.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 12/19 | 163 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 23.2 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 15/26 | 180 | 2 | 2 | 42 | 0 | 15.4 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 22/31 | 253 | 2 | 1 | 53 | 0 | 19.4 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 16/22 | 209 | 2 | 1 | 45 | 1 | 24.9 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 22/28 | 213 | 3 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 23.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 14/25 | 148 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 33/46 | 394 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 38.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 20.9 | QB40 (0.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 19.8 | QB5 (23.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 20.4 | QB26 (6.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 21.2 | QB7 (24.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 20.8 | QB1 (37.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 19.4 | QB14 (16.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 20.3 | QB20 (8.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 18.7 | QB1 (42.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 20.2 | QB10 (19.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 18.8 | QB3 (28.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade