
Why: high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs NYG: allows 33.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Matthew Stafford. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (364/578). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR21), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W9 | vs | 7 | 4 | 34 | 0 | 7.4 | 5.4 | 3.4 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Over/under: 44.1 (10th highest) Win probability: Seahawks 68% (8th highest) San Francisco 49ers @ Los Angeles Rams Projected score: Rams 29, 49ers 22 Lineup locks: Christian McCaffrey, Kyren Williams, Puka Nacua, Davante Adams Fantasy scoop
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 6 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 54% | 22% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 9 | 4 | 71 | 0 | 46% | 24% | 11.1 | 9.1 | 7.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 6 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 43% | 19% | 6.9 | 4.9 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 5 | 4 | 58 | 2 | 75% | 19% | 21.8 | 19.8 | 17.8 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 8 | 5 | 62 | 2 | 77% | 24% | 23.2 | 20.7 | 18.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 86% | 30% | 7.1 | 6.6 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 8 | 6 | 77 | 1 | 51% | 24% | 19.7 | 16.7 | 13.7 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 7 | 5 | 60 | 2 | 60% | 23% | 23.0 | 20.5 | 18.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 8 | 5 | 35 | 3 | 59% | 24% | 26.5 | 24.0 | 21.5 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 9 | 4 | 39 | 0 | 79% | 35% | 7.9 | 5.9 | 3.9 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 11 | 5 | 88 | 0 | 85% | 24% | 13.8 | 11.3 | 8.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 4 | 56 | 1 | 83% | 15% | 15.6 | 13.6 | 11.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 8 | 3 | 56 | 1 | 86% | 24% | 14.6 | 13.1 | 11.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 13 | 6 | 106 | 1 | 80% | 41% | 22.6 | 19.6 | 16.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 8 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 90% | 29% | 9.1 | 7.1 | 5.1 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 12 | 6 | 88 | 1 | 92% | 34% | 20.8 | 17.8 | 14.8 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 8 | 5 | 47 | 0 | 76% | 26% | 9.7 | 7.2 | 4.7 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 13 | 7 | 68 | 1 | 97% | 31% | 19.8 | 16.3 | 12.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 28 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 12.9 | WR35 (11.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 14.0 | WR46 (6.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 14.0 | WR9 (21.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 14.3 | WR8 (23.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 14.3 | WR47 (7.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 14.6 | WR12 (19.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 14.1 | WR3 (23.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 13.0 | WR6 (26.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | START | 14.7 | WR43 (7.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W5 | START | 14.4 | WR22 (13.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade