Loading…
Van Jefferson
WR · WSH
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
21.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs PHI: allows 26.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 26/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs PHI
contextvs PHI: 2 games, 0.5 PPR avg (1 as LAR, 1 as PIT)
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %31%
Target share9%
Opportunities3
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
102Easy
#10 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
97Average
#22 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
102Easy
#10 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Top Free Agent Fits For WR DeAndre Hopkinsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-22
- Potential Trade Destinations For Patriots WR Kayshon Bouttenfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-19
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs NO | 3 | 3 | 46 | 0 | 31% | 9% | 7.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs KC | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 68% | 7% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ SF | 5 | 1 | 43 | 0 | 58% | 19% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W14 | @ CLE | 4 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 73% | 16% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs JAX | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 75% | 11% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs SEA | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 91% | 3% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W11 | vs HOU | 7 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 92% | 19% | 11.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs LAC | 4 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 83% | 19% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W8 | @ IND | 8 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 79% | 22% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W7 | vs NE | 4 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 85% | 13% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W6 | @ LV | 6 | 4 | 75 | 0 | 74% | 18% | 11.5 |
| 2025 W5 | @ ARI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @HOU | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 38% | 4% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W3 | vsIND | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 34% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs LAR | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 26% | 7% | 3.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ DEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs CIN | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 67% | 14% | 4.8 |
| 2024 W17 | vsKC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43% | 3% | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim97%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 97%
of 33 Sit calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade