
Why: projected outside startable range
vs IND: allows 16.9 PPR/g to QB, rank 15/32 (Average). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W3 | vs | 22/31 | 202 | 0 | 0 | 101 | 2 | 28.2 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Lamar Jackson says that second contract should be a big one. Lamar Jackson on Zay Flowers' next contract: "His value is out of this world"
source ↗| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 11/18 | 238 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 20.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 7/10 | 101 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 8/12 | 150 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 0 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 19/35 | 219 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 1 | 21.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 17/32 | 246 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 6.5 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 13/23 | 153 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 14/25 | 193 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 17/29 | 176 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 16.6 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 18/23 | 204 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 25.6 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 14/20 | 147 | 1 | 1 | 48 | 0 | 10.7 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 21/27 | 288 | 3 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 27.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 19/29 | 225 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 26.3 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 14/19 | 209 | 2 | 0 | 70 | 1 | 29.4 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 16/32 | 217 | 2 | 0 | 63 | 0 | 23.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 10/15 | 168 | 2 | 0 | 87 | 1 | 29.4 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 15/23 | 207 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 20.5 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 21/25 | 290 | 5 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 36.1 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 23/36 | 237 | 2 | 0 | 79 | 0 | 25.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 30 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 14.0 | QB7 (20.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 16.7 | QB27 (4.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 16.9 | QB22 (14.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 15.8 | QB8 (21.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 18.8 | QB27 (6.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 18.0 | QB24 (7.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 17.7 | QB29 (4.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 18.9 | QB14 (16.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 20.2 | QB9 (25.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | START | 20.5 | QB26 (10.7) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade