
Why: limited usage
vs DAL: allows 39.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W5 | vs | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1.6 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 7 | 3 | 55 | 1 | 49% | 16% | 14.5 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 16% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 2 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 31% | 6% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49% | 9% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 5 | 4 | 36 | 0 | 46% | 17% | 7.6 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 29% | 3% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 7 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 73% | 25% | 3.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 6 | 5 | 56 | 0 | 56% | 17% | 10.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 6 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 78% | 19% | 6.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 51% | 9% | 3.3 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 5 | 3 | 34 | 1 | 72% | 23% | 12.4 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 4 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 92% | 13% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 6 | 4 | 70 | 1 | 80% | 21% | 17.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66% | 3% | -2.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 5 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 75% | 15% | 7.1 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 5 | 4 | 65 | 0 | 80% | 20% | 10.5 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 5 | 5 | 65 | 0 | 81% | 24% | 11.5 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.5 | WR14 (14.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 4.4 | WR103 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 4.5 | WR127 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 5.6 | WR61 (4.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.1 | WR124 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 7.6 | WR42 (7.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 8.8 | WR100 (1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 8.5 | WR66 (3.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 8.3 | WR35 (10.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 8.7 | WR53 (6.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade