Loading…
Adam Trautman
TE · DEN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
19.9
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs KC: allows 11.0 PPR/g to TE, rank 25/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs KC
contextvs KC: 6 games, 2.0 PPR avg
Small sample (6 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %58%
Target share0%
Opportunities0
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
98Average
#21 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
79Hard
#31 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
98Average
#21 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Fantasy Football: Late-round sleepers to target in draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-21
- Top Free Agent Landing Spots For TE Jonnu Smithnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-20
- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
- Fantasy Football: 3 sleepers for 2026www.pff.com · 2026-06-24
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ KC | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 72% | 5% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs JAX | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 58% | 7% | 3.4 |
| 2025 W15 | vs GB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ LV | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 74% | 6% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ WSH | 4 | 3 | 47 | 0 | 59% | 10% | 7.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vsKC | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 66% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W10 | vsLV | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 69% | 4% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W9 | @ HOU | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 73% | 6% | 4.5 |
| 2025 W8 | vs DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs NYG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ NYJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ PHI | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 42% | 3% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CIN | 3 | 2 | 32 | 0 | 52% | 7% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W3 | @LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ IND | 3 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 62% | 10% | 10.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs TEN | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 58% | 3% | 1.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vsKC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64% | 0% | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim94%hit rate
34 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 94%
of 34 Sit calls
Based on 34 graded calls.
Recent calls
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade