
Why: heavy usage, soft matchup




vs JAX: allows 31.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 16/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Bo Nix. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (348/570). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR39), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | vs | 12 | 6 | 86 | 1 | 20.6 | 17.6 | 14.6 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
But the Broncos traded for Jaylen Waddle to play opposite Courtland Sutton, so that's a crowded wide receivers room for new playcaller Davis Webb.
source ↗But the Broncos traded for Jaylen Waddle to play opposite Courtland Sutton, so that's a crowded wide receivers room for new playcaller Davis Webb.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 78% | 9% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 10 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 82% | 27% | 8.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 12 | 6 | 86 | 1 | 94% | 26% | 20.6 | 17.6 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 10 | 7 | 113 | 1 | 88% | 31% | 24.3 | 20.8 | 17.3 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 10 | 6 | 62 | 0 | 65% | 29% | 12.2 | 9.2 | 6.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 6 | 5 | 62 | 1 | 81% | 14% | 17.2 | 14.7 | 12.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 8 | 4 | 59 | 0 | 92% | 24% | 9.9 | 7.9 | 5.9 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 87% | 15% | 5.4 | 3.9 | 2.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 6 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 92% | 18% | 10.0 | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 6 | 4 | 67 | 0 | 84% | 22% | 10.7 | 8.7 | 6.7 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 10 | 6 | 87 | 0 | 94% | 21% | 16.7 | 13.7 | 10.7 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 3 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 80% | 12% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 10 | 8 | 99 | 0 | 95% | 28% | 17.9 | 13.9 | 9.9 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 5 | 81 | 1 | 85% | 14% | 19.1 | 16.6 | 14.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 8 | 6 | 118 | 1 | 81% | 35% | 23.8 | 20.8 | 17.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 78% | 13% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 9 | 6 | 61 | 1 | 95% | 25% | 18.1 | 15.1 | 12.1 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 7 | 5 | 98 | 1 | 65% | 24% | 20.8 | 18.3 | 15.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 15.3 | WR95 (1.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 15.0 | WR44 (8.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 13.9 | WR10 (20.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 11.0 | WR4 (24.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 10.7 | WR21 (12.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 10.7 | WR16 (17.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 10.7 | WR32 (9.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 10.8 | WR53 (5.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 11.4 | WR36 (10.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 12.6 | WR36 (10.7) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade