
Why: projected outside startable range
vs CAR: allows 27.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 23/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Michael Penix Jr.. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (226/472). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR106), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W7 | vs | 6 | 4 | 25 | 0 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 5% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 11% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 5 | 2 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 17% | 5.3 | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 11% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 11% | 8.7 | 7.7 | 6.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 28% | 9% | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 35% | 3% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 13% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 11% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 8 | 6 | 58 | 1 | – | – | 64% | 24% | 17.8 | 14.8 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 7 | 7 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 20% | 10.3 | 6.8 | 3.3 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 52% | 12% | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 6 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 84% | 21% | 4.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 6 | 5 | 41 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 17% | 9.1 | 6.6 | 4.1 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 58% | 14% | 6.6 | 5.1 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 5 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 44% | 15% | 4.1 | 3.1 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 7 | 4 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 21% | 8.2 | 6.2 | 4.2 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 5 | 2 | 51 | 0 | – | – | 69% | 17% | 7.1 | 6.1 | 5.1 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 7.2 | WR114 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 5.1 | WR68 (5.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 3.9 | WR115 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 2.9 | WR35 (8.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 5.0 | WR75 (3.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 7.6 | WR89 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 8.7 | WR114 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 10.0 | WR84 (1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 9.2 | WR14 (17.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.9 | WR38 (10.3) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade