Loading…
Mack Hollins
WR · NE
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
20.2
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs SEA: allows 26.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 28/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs SEA
contextvs SEA: 1 game, 0.0 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W8 |  BUF· prior | @ SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %66%
Target share21%
Opportunities9
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#28 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
95Hard
#23 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#28 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Mike Vrabel has "a lot of respect" for how Kayshon Boutte has handled a tricky situationwww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-27
- Patriots: Drake Maye targets A.J. Brown with first...www.espn.com · 2026-07-25
- 'Slippers and slides, baby!': For fun or therapy, NFL players love their off-field footwearwww.espn.com · 2026-07-19
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | @ BAL | 9 | 7 | 69 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 21% | 13.9 |
| 2025 W15 | vsBUF | 8 | 4 | 41 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 36% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs NYG | 4 | 3 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 13% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ CIN | 6 | 2 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 18% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs NYJ | 5 | 4 | 64 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 15% | 10.4 |
| 2025 W10 | @ TB | 10 | 6 | 106 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 35% | 16.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs ATL | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 7% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W8 | vs CLE | 7 | 7 | 89 | 0 | – | – | 72% | 30% | 15.9 |
| 2025 W7 | @ TEN | 2 | 2 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 66% | 8% | 7.3 |
| 2025 W6 | @ NO | 3 | 2 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 13% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CAR | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | – | – | 49% | 6% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vs PIT | 4 | 4 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 11% | 6.7 |
| 2025 W2 | @ MIA | 2 | 1 | 8 | 1 | – | – | 65% | 9% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W1 | vs LV | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 4% | 1.3 |
| 2024 W18 | @ NE | 4 | 3 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 99% | 13% | 5.5 |
| 2024 W17 | vsNYJ | 2 | 2 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 7% | 5.3 |
| 2024 W16 | vsNE | 3 | 2 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 11% | 4.5 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim81%hit rate
32 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 0%
of 1 Flex call
🔴 84%
of 31 Sit calls
Based on 32 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | BAL | SIT | 9.8 | WR24 (13.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | BUF | SIT | 10.5 | WR49 (8.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | NYG | SIT | 10.3 | WR62 (5.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | CIN | FLEX | 11.6 | WR56 (5.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | NYJ | SIT | 10.6 | WR29 (10.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | TB | SIT | 7.8 | WR19 (16.6) | ✗ |
| 2025 W9 | ATL | SIT | 7.4 | WR73 (2.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | CLE | SIT | 5.0 | WR15 (15.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W7 | TEN | SIT | 5.2 | WR53 (7.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W6 | NO | SIT | 5.3 | WR65 (4.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade