
Why: projected outside startable range
vs PIT: allows 35.0 PPR/g to WR, rank 7/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Drake Maye. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (282/479). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR109), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W3 | vs | 4 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 6.7 | 4.7 | 2.7 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
It’s never as easy as it is out there.” Patriots There have been discussions about WR Mack Hollins possibly moving to tight end this season, and the veteran has no issues with playing any role as long as it translates to winning games. AFC
source ↗It’s never as easy as it is out there.” Patriots There have been discussions about WR Mack Hollins possibly moving to tight end this season, and the veteran has no issues with playing any role as long as it translates to winning games. AFC
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 5 | 4 | 51 | 0 | – | – | 70% | 16% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 9 | 7 | 69 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 21% | 13.9 | 10.4 | 6.9 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 8 | 4 | 41 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 36% | 8.1 | 6.1 | 4.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 4 | 3 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 13% | 5.3 | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 6 | 2 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 18% | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 5 | 4 | 64 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 15% | 10.4 | 8.4 | 6.4 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 10 | 6 | 106 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 35% | 16.6 | 13.6 | 10.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 7% | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 7 | 7 | 89 | 0 | – | – | 72% | 30% | 15.9 | 12.4 | 8.9 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 2 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 66% | 8% | 7.3 | 6.3 | 5.3 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 3 | 2 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 13% | 4.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | – | – | 49% | 6% | 7.4 | 6.9 | 6.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 4 | 4 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 11% | 6.7 | 4.7 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 2 | 1 | 8 | 1 | – | – | 65% | 9% | 7.8 | 7.3 | 6.8 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 4% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 4 | 3 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 99% | 13% | 5.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 2 | 2 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 7% | 5.3 | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 9.8 | WR24 (13.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 10.5 | WR49 (8.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 10.3 | WR62 (5.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 11.6 | WR56 (5.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 10.6 | WR29 (10.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 7.8 | WR19 (16.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 7.4 | WR73 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 5.0 | WR15 (15.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 5.2 | WR53 (7.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 5.3 | WR65 (4.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade