
Why: high-scoring game
vs CIN: allows 28.3 PPR/g to RB, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 5 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 64 | 0 | 67% | 21% | 21.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 7 | 26 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 68% | 11% | 6.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 9 | 50 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 78 | 1 | 54% | 18% | 23.8 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 13 | 80 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 52% | 26% | 19.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 4 | 15 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 48% | 21% | 16.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 5 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 42% | 14% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 10 | 92 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 30 | 0 | 51% | 20% | 18.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 9 | 24 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 81 | 2 | 63% | 28% | 29.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 52% | 11% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 3 | -1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 37% | 14% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 5 | 31 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 38% | 7% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 3 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 39% | 6% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 6 | 22 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 34% | 21% | 9.6 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 19 | 99 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 35 | 0 | 77% | 27% | 31.4 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 26% | 5% | 9.6 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 5 | 20 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 42% | 17% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 7 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 54% | 14% | 5.3 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 11 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 49% | 10% | 4.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 12.8 | RB4 (21.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 12.0 | RB34 (6.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 11.8 | RB8 (23.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 13.2 | RB9 (19.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 11.2 | RB12 (16.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 11.7 | RB43 (6.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 9.9 | RB9 (18.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 7.5 | RB5 (29.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.9 | RB51 (2.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 11.1 | RB29 (7.4) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade