Loading…
Stat Explorer
Sortable, filterable leaderboards across every tracked metric.
As-of weekAs of Week 6, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–6 only. Uses no game after Week 6.
321 players · 5 metrics · click a column to sort
Stat leaders
321 players
Stat leaders
321 players
Josh JacobsRBOUTTeamLVGames6Opportunities142Snap share78%Target share19%Fantasy points (PPR)89Opportunity Score (proxy)0.72
TeamSFGames6Opportunities137Snap share77%Target share19%Fantasy points (PPR)148Opportunity Score (proxy)0.60
TeamJAXGames6Opportunities137Snap share79%Target share12%Fantasy points (PPR)115Opportunity Score (proxy)0.55
TeamDALGames6Opportunities125Snap share69%Target share16%Fantasy points (PPR)92Opportunity Score (proxy)0.57
TeamLARGames6Opportunities121Snap share83%Target share10%Fantasy points (PPR)111Opportunity Score (proxy)0.56
TeamCINGames6Opportunities117Snap share74%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)69Opportunity Score (proxy)0.62
TeamPHIGames6Opportunities113Snap share57%Target share13%Fantasy points (PPR)96Opportunity Score (proxy)0.46
TeamINDGames5Opportunities113Snap share77%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)104Opportunity Score (proxy)0.47
TeamATLGames6Opportunities112Snap share72%Target share18%Fantasy points (PPR)95Opportunity Score (proxy)·
TeamTENGames6Opportunities111Snap share55%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)87Opportunity Score (proxy)0.53
TeamMINGames6Opportunities110Snap share71%Target share12%Fantasy points (PPR)70Opportunity Score (proxy)0.63
TeamHOUGames6Opportunities109Snap share·Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)·Opportunity Score (proxy)0.47
Isiah PachecoRBIRTeamKCGames6Opportunities106Snap share·Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)87Opportunity Score (proxy)0.47
TeamDETGames5Opportunities104Snap share59%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)85Opportunity Score (proxy)0.41
TeamNEGames6Opportunities102Snap share65%Target share13%Fantasy points (PPR)64Opportunity Score (proxy)0.49
TeamSEAGames5Opportunities96Snap share64%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)92Opportunity Score (proxy)0.56
TeamMIAGames6Opportunities95Snap share60%Target share11%Fantasy points (PPR)139Opportunity Score (proxy)0.46
TeamBUFGames6Opportunities93Snap share55%Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)70Opportunity Score (proxy)0.44
TeamWSHGames6Opportunities90Snap share·Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)85Opportunity Score (proxy)0.62
TeamTBGames5Opportunities87Snap share78%Target share11%Fantasy points (PPR)53Opportunity Score (proxy)0.48
TeamCARGames5Opportunities85Snap share·Target share13%Fantasy points (PPR)·Opportunity Score (proxy)0.44
TeamNYJGames6Opportunities84Snap share·Target share11%Fantasy points (PPR)79Opportunity Score (proxy)·
TeamCLEGames5Opportunities82Snap share·Target share·Fantasy points (PPR)65Opportunity Score (proxy)·
TeamCINGames6Opportunities74Snap share95%Target share33%Fantasy points (PPR)124Opportunity Score (proxy)0.79
Showing 5 of 56 metrics. Add more from the “Cuts, columns & filters” drawerMetrics rail. Universe = the union of every tracked metric’s leaderboard (top players per metric), merged into one row per player. Blank (·) = outside that metric’s leaders. Widening to the full roster needs a data-export change (tracked separately).
Trending usage: Risers
Usage momentum: the slope of snap share, target share, opportunities and red-zone touches over a trailing 4-week window, blended per position. Earliest breakout detector. Noise-guarded descriptive trajectory.
Rank by
WR · Risers
As of Week 6, 2023
Noise-guard: ≥3 wk · ≥12 snaps
| # | Player | Momentum | Now | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Kadarius ToneyWR KC | +1.81 | 42%from 27% | 4 wk19 snaps |
| 2 |  Kendrick BourneWR NE | +1.74 | 93%from 72% | 4 wk43 snaps |
| 3 |  Brandon PowellWR MIN | +1.55 | 60%from 25% | 4 wk15 snaps |
| 4 |  Allen RobinsonWR PIT | +1.44 | 86%from 84% | 3 wk52 snaps |
| 5 |  Jaylen WaddleWR MIA | +1.29 | 69%from 75% | 3 wk46 snaps |
| 6 |  Brandon AiyukWR SF | +1.21 | 98%from 84% | 3 wk53 snaps |
| 7 |  George PickensWRPIT | +1.20 | 88%from 92% | 3 wk57 snaps |
| 8 |  Wan'Dale RobinsonWR NYG | +0.94 | 60%from 53% | 4 wk38 snaps |
| 9 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | +0.90 | 93%from 81% | 4 wk50 snaps |
| 10 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | +0.84 | 84%from 82% | 4 wk52 snaps |
| 11 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | +0.84 | 78%from 74% | 3 wk50 snaps |
| 12 |  Jalin HyattWRNYG | +0.77 | 73%from 53% | 4 wk38 snaps |
| 13 |  Joshua PalmerWR LAC | +0.77 | 97%from 81% | 3 wk56 snaps |
| 14 |  Calvin RidleyWR JAX | +0.71 | 80%from 82% | 4 wk60 snaps |
| 15 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWRSEA | +0.70 | 72%from 56% | 3 wk38 snaps |
| 16 |  Tre TuckerWR LV | +0.63 | 31%from 21% | 4 wk15 snaps |
| 17 |  Trey PalmerWR TB | +0.60 | 66%from 71% | 3 wk41 snaps |
| 18 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | +0.60 | 96%from 97% | 4 wk61 snaps |
| 19 |  Jonathan MingoWR CAR | +0.59 | 93%from 71% | 3 wk50 snaps |
| 20 |  Ray-Ray McCloud IIIWRSF | +0.53 | 71%from 40% | 4 wk27 snaps |
| 21 |  Nick Westbrook-IkhineWR TEN | +0.51 | 71%from 76% | 4 wk44 snaps |
| 22 |  DeAndre HopkinsWRTEN | +0.48 | 87%from 74% | 4 wk42 snaps |
| 23 |  Scotty MillerWR ATL | +0.47 | 34%from 24% | 4 wk18 snaps |
| 24 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | +0.47 | 91%from 94% | 4 wk62 snaps |
WR · Risers
As of Week 6, 2023
Noise-guard: ≥3 wk · ≥12 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.81
- Now
- 42%from 27%
- Window
- 4 wk19 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.74
- Now
- 93%from 72%
- Window
- 4 wk43 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.55
- Now
- 60%from 25%
- Window
- 4 wk15 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.44
- Now
- 86%from 84%
- Window
- 3 wk52 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.29
- Now
- 69%from 75%
- Window
- 3 wk46 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.21
- Now
- 98%from 84%
- Window
- 3 wk53 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +1.20
- Now
- 88%from 92%
- Window
- 3 wk57 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.94
- Now
- 60%from 53%
- Window
- 4 wk38 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.90
- Now
- 93%from 81%
- Window
- 4 wk50 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.84
- Now
- 84%from 82%
- Window
- 4 wk52 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.84
- Now
- 78%from 74%
- Window
- 3 wk50 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.77
- Now
- 73%from 53%
- Window
- 4 wk38 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.77
- Now
- 97%from 81%
- Window
- 3 wk56 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.71
- Now
- 80%from 82%
- Window
- 4 wk60 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.70
- Now
- 72%from 56%
- Window
- 3 wk38 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.63
- Now
- 31%from 21%
- Window
- 4 wk15 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.60
- Now
- 66%from 71%
- Window
- 3 wk41 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.60
- Now
- 96%from 97%
- Window
- 4 wk61 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.59
- Now
- 93%from 71%
- Window
- 3 wk50 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.53
- Now
- 71%from 40%
- Window
- 4 wk27 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.51
- Now
- 71%from 76%
- Window
- 4 wk44 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.48
- Now
- 87%from 74%
- Window
- 4 wk42 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.47
- Now
- 34%from 24%
- Window
- 4 wk18 snaps
- Momentum (z/wk)
- +0.47
- Now
- 91%from 94%
- Window
- 4 wk62 snaps
Boards are eligible-only. Every row already clears the noise floor (≥3 played weeks and ≥12 average snaps in the window), so a one-week spike never registers. A trend is descriptive, never a prediction.
Target Share Risers — Last 3 Weeks
Whose passing-game role expanded most — mean team target share over the last three weeks versus the prior three. A descriptive receipt, not a projection.
WR / TE / RB · target-share climbers
Wks 16–18 vs 13–15
| # | Player | Baseline → Recent | Δ share pts | Gms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWRMIA | 22%43% | +21 | 3 |
| 2 |  Justice HillRB BAL | 5%24% | +19 | 3 |
| 3 |  Bo MeltonWR GB | 6%24% | +18 | 3 |
| 4 |  Brandon JohnsonWR DEN | 1%17% | +16 | 3 |
| 5 |  Brian Robinson Jr.RBWSH | 0%15% | +15 | 2 |
| 6 |  Andrei IosivasWRCIN | 2%15% | +13 | 3 |
| 7 |  Mike GesickiTENE | 3%16% | +13 | 3 |
| 8 | Joshua PalmerWRLAC | 13%25% | +12 | 2 |
| 9 |  Johnny MundtTEMIN | 3%15% | +12 | 3 |
| 10 |  Justin JeffersonWRMIN | 20%31% | +11 | 3 |
| 11 |  Austin HooperTELV | 3%14% | +10 | 3 |
| 12 |  Evan EngramTEJAX | 21%31% | +10 | 3 |
| 13 |  Zay FlowersWRBAL | 17%27% | +10 | 2 |
| 14 |  DJ Chark Jr.WRCAR | 12%22% | +10 | 3 |
| 15 |  Khalil ShakirWRBUF | 5%15% | +10 | 3 |
| 16 |  Van JeffersonWRATL | 2%11% | +10 | 3 |
| 17 |  Juwan JohnsonTE NO | 13%23% | +9 | 3 |
| 18 |  Michael WilsonWR ARI | 8%17% | +9 | 3 |
| 19 |  Khalil HerbertRB CHI | 1%11% | +9 | 3 |
| 20 |  Christian McCaffreyRBSF | 14%22% | +9 | 2 |
WR / TE / RB · target-share climbers
Wks 16–18 vs 13–15
- Baseline → recent target share
- 22%43%
- Change in target share (points)
- +21
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 5%24%
- Change in target share (points)
- +19
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 6%24%
- Change in target share (points)
- +18
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 1%17%
- Change in target share (points)
- +16
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 0%15%
- Change in target share (points)
- +15
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 2
- Baseline → recent target share
- 2%15%
- Change in target share (points)
- +13
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 3%16%
- Change in target share (points)
- +13
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 13%25%
- Change in target share (points)
- +12
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 2
- Baseline → recent target share
- 3%15%
- Change in target share (points)
- +12
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 20%31%
- Change in target share (points)
- +11
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 3%14%
- Change in target share (points)
- +10
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 21%31%
- Change in target share (points)
- +10
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 17%27%
- Change in target share (points)
- +10
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 2
- Baseline → recent target share
- 12%22%
- Change in target share (points)
- +10
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 5%15%
- Change in target share (points)
- +10
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 2%11%
- Change in target share (points)
- +10
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 13%23%
- Change in target share (points)
- +9
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 8%17%
- Change in target share (points)
- +9
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 1%11%
- Change in target share (points)
- +9
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 3
- Baseline → recent target share
- 14%22%
- Change in target share (points)
- +9
- Recent-window games (sample)
- 2
Biggest week-over-week climbers in team target share: last 3 weeks vs the prior 3. Who's seeing their passing-game role expand (WR/TE/RB). Δ is the change in mean weekly team target share (percentage points) between the two windows; positive means the role is expanding. Descriptive week-over-week delta, not a prediction.
Money downs vs all downs
Targets on 3rd & 4th down — the chain-moving snaps most apps fold into a season total. Flip to Money Downs to see who the offense trusts when it matters; the all-downs target share is the baseline they read against.
Money-down targets (3rd+4th)
Targets on 3rd+4th down — the high-leverage passing situations most apps don't split out: who the offense trusts on money downs. TARGET-based, not routes: tank01 has no routes-run data, so this is money-down target share / yards-per-target, not YPRR/TPRR (see FFM-1560).
Money-down yards per target (3rd+4th): Receiving yards per money-down (3rd+4th) target (min 10 targets): efficiency on the downs that move the chains. TARGET-based, not routes: tank01 has no routes-run data, so this is money-down target share / yards-per-target, not YPRR/TPRR (see FFM-1560).
WR · Money downs (3rd+4th)
As of Week 6, 2023
| # | Player | MD tgts | MD tgt% | MD Y/tgt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Adam ThielenWRCAR | 213.5/gm | 35% | 9.2 |
| 2 | Puka NacuaWRLAR | 204.0/gm | 36% | 7.9 |
| 3 |  Robert WoodsWR HOU | 193.2/gm | 33% | 4.7 |
| 4 | Stefon DiggsWRBUF | 183.6/gm | 35% | 5.7 |
| 5 |  Chris OlaveWRNO | 172.8/gm | 27% | 8.4 |
| 6 | DeAndre HopkinsWRTEN | 172.8/gm | 33% | 8.4 |
| 7 |  Drake LondonWRATL | 173.4/gm | 27% | 6.2 |
| 8 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 162.7/gm | 25% | 5.6 |
| 9 | Justin JeffersonWRMIN | 163.2/gm | 24% | 4.9 |
| 10 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 163.2/gm | 24% | 10.9 |
| 11 |  DJ MooreWRCHI | 163.2/gm | 33% | 12.3 |
| 12 |  Nico CollinsWRHOU | 152.5/gm | 26% | 16.7 |
| 13 |  Christian KirkWRJAX | 152.5/gm | 28% | 6.4 |
| 14 |  Davante AdamsWRLV | 152.5/gm | 29% | 11.6 |
| 15 | Ja'Marr ChaseWRCIN | 153.0/gm | 24% | 6.1 |
| 16 |  Tyler BoydWRCIN | 142.3/gm | 23% | 5.0 |
| 17 |  Josh DownsWRIND | 142.3/gm | 22% | 8.0 |
| 18 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 142.3/gm | 30% | 12.8 |
| 19 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 142.3/gm | 38% | 4.6 |
| 20 |  Elijah MooreWR CLE | 142.8/gm | 29% | 3.1 |
| 21 |  Romeo DoubsWRGB | 142.8/gm | 28% | 6.7 |
| 22 | Zay FlowersWRBAL | 142.8/gm | 33% | 6.7 |
| 23 |  DeVonta SmithWRPHI | 132.2/gm | 28% | 7.0 |
| 24 |  Keenan AllenWRLAC | 132.6/gm | 28% | 10.7 |
WR · Money downs (3rd+4th)
As of Week 6, 2023
- Money-down targets
- 213.5/gm
- Money-down target share
- 35%
- Money-down yards / target
- 9.2
- Money-down targets
- 204.0/gm
- Money-down target share
- 36%
- Money-down yards / target
- 7.9
- Money-down targets
- 193.2/gm
- Money-down target share
- 33%
- Money-down yards / target
- 4.7
- Money-down targets
- 183.6/gm
- Money-down target share
- 35%
- Money-down yards / target
- 5.7
- Money-down targets
- 172.8/gm
- Money-down target share
- 27%
- Money-down yards / target
- 8.4
- Money-down targets
- 172.8/gm
- Money-down target share
- 33%
- Money-down yards / target
- 8.4
- Money-down targets
- 173.4/gm
- Money-down target share
- 27%
- Money-down yards / target
- 6.2
- Money-down targets
- 162.7/gm
- Money-down target share
- 25%
- Money-down yards / target
- 5.6
- Money-down targets
- 163.2/gm
- Money-down target share
- 24%
- Money-down yards / target
- 4.9
- Money-down targets
- 163.2/gm
- Money-down target share
- 24%
- Money-down yards / target
- 10.9
- Money-down targets
- 152.5/gm
- Money-down target share
- 26%
- Money-down yards / target
- 16.7
- Money-down targets
- 152.5/gm
- Money-down target share
- 28%
- Money-down yards / target
- 6.4
- Money-down targets
- 152.5/gm
- Money-down target share
- 29%
- Money-down yards / target
- 11.6
- Money-down targets
- 153.0/gm
- Money-down target share
- 24%
- Money-down yards / target
- 6.1
- Money-down targets
- 142.3/gm
- Money-down target share
- 23%
- Money-down yards / target
- 5.0
- Money-down targets
- 142.3/gm
- Money-down target share
- 22%
- Money-down yards / target
- 8.0
- Money-down targets
- 142.3/gm
- Money-down target share
- 30%
- Money-down yards / target
- 12.8
- Money-down targets
- 142.3/gm
- Money-down target share
- 38%
- Money-down yards / target
- 4.6
- Money-down targets
- 142.8/gm
- Money-down target share
- 29%
- Money-down yards / target
- 3.1
- Money-down targets
- 142.8/gm
- Money-down target share
- 28%
- Money-down yards / target
- 6.7
- Money-down targets
- 142.8/gm
- Money-down target share
- 33%
- Money-down yards / target
- 6.7
- Money-down targets
- 132.2/gm
- Money-down target share
- 28%
- Money-down yards / target
- 7.0
- Money-down targets
- 132.6/gm
- Money-down target share
- 28%
- Money-down yards / target
- 10.7
Descriptive leaderboard, not a prediction. Money-down = 3rd & 4th down targets from official play-by-play. Yards / target applies a min-target floor (below it: “—”). Target share, not routes: we have no routes-run denominator, so this is not YPRR/TPRR.
WR target share
Who commands the offense’s looks. Flip on full-route participantsto keep only WRs on the field for most of the offense’s snaps — a target share earned on a partial route tree reads differently from a true every-down role.
WR · target share
As of Week 6, 2023
| # | Player | Tgt share | Snap% | Gms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Cooper KuppWRLAR | 39% | 98% | 2 |
| 2 | Stefon DiggsWRBUF | 36% | 82% | 6 |
| 3 | Chris OlaveWRNO | 34% | 81% | 6 |
| 4 | Garrett WilsonWRNYJ | 34% | 91% | 6 |
| 5 | Tyreek HillWRMIA | 33% | 63% | 6 |
| 6 | Ja'Marr ChaseWRCIN | 33% | 95% | 6 |
| 7 | Puka NacuaWRLAR | 33% | 92% | 6 |
| 8 | Brandon AiyukWRSF | 32% | 78% | 5 |
| 9 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 32% | 88% | 5 |
| 10 | Zay FlowersWRBAL | 31% | 90% | 6 |
| 11 | A.J. BrownWRPHI | 31% | 94% | 6 |
| 12 | DJ MooreWRCHI | 30% | 93% | 6 |
| 13 | Davante AdamsWRLV | 30% | 92% | 6 |
| 14 | Justin JeffersonWRMIN | 30% | 92% | 5 |
| 15 | Keenan AllenWRLAC | 29% | 89% | 5 |
| 16 | DeAndre HopkinsWRTEN | 29% | 72% | 6 |
| 17 |  Hollywood BrownWRARI | 29% | 91% | 6 |
| 18 | Michael Pittman Jr.WRIND | 28% | 98% | 6 |
| 19 | George PickensWRPIT | 28% | 90% | 5 |
| 20 |  Jakobi MeyersWRLV | 27% | 90% | 5 |
| 21 | Adam ThielenWRCAR | 27% | 89% | 6 |
| 22 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 27% | 69% | 5 |
| 23 | Terry McLaurinWRWSH | 26% | 82% | 6 |
| 24 | Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 25% | 72% | 5 |
WR · target share
As of Week 6, 2023
- Target share
- 39%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 98%
- Games
- 2
- Target share
- 36%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 82%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 34%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 81%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 34%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 91%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 33%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 63%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 33%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 95%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 33%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 92%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 32%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 78%
- Games
- 5
- Target share
- 32%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 88%
- Games
- 5
- Target share
- 31%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 90%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 31%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 94%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 30%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 92%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 30%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 92%
- Games
- 5
- Target share
- 29%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 89%
- Games
- 5
- Target share
- 29%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 72%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 29%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 91%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 28%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 98%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 28%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 90%
- Games
- 5
- Target share
- 27%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 90%
- Games
- 5
- Target share
- 27%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 89%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 27%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 69%
- Games
- 5
- Target share
- 26%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 82%
- Games
- 6
- Target share
- 25%
- Snap share (on-field participation)
- 72%
- Games
- 5
share of team targets: passing-game role Snap share is the honest on-field participation proxy for route participation — tank01 has no routes-run denominator, so this is real snap share, never a fabricated routes rate. Descriptive leaderboard, not a prediction.
Schedule strength by position
Easiest → hardest remaining schedule per team. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate.
WR · Rest-of-season schedule
Remaining opponents from week 2 forward — the trade/streaming horizon.
100 = league avg · >100 softer
| # ▲ | Team | Schedule | SOS index | Avg opp DvP | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHI | Easy | 108 | 6.41 | 16 |
| 2 | HOU | Easy | 106 | 6.30 | 16 |
| 3 | JAX | Easy | 104 | 6.23 | 16 |
| 4 | MIN | Easy | 104 | 6.19 | 16 |
| 5 |  DAL | Easy | 103 | 6.16 | 16 |
| 6 | TEN | Easy | 103 | 6.16 | 16 |
| 7 | SEA | Easy | 103 | 6.14 | 16 |
| 8 | WSH | Easy | 103 | 6.14 | 16 |
| 9 | CLE | Easy | 102 | 6.11 | 16 |
| 10 | NYG | Easy | 102 | 6.09 | 16 |
| 11 | ARI | Average | 102 | 6.09 | 16 |
| 12 | CIN | Average | 102 | 6.06 | 16 |
| 13 | GB | Average | 101 | 6.03 | 16 |
| 14 | TB | Average | 101 | 6.01 | 16 |
| 15 | BUF | Average | 100 | 5.97 | 16 |
| 16 | NO | Average | 100 | 5.97 | 16 |
| 17 | DET | Average | 100 | 5.96 | 16 |
| 18 | IND | Average | 99 | 5.90 | 16 |
| 19 | LAR | Average | 99 | 5.88 | 16 |
| 20 | SF | Average | 98 | 5.86 | 16 |
| 21 | NE | Average | 98 | 5.85 | 16 |
| 22 | ATL | Average | 98 | 5.84 | 16 |
| 23 | KC | Hard | 98 | 5.84 | 16 |
| 24 | DEN | Hard | 98 | 5.83 | 16 |
| 25 | MIA | Hard | 97 | 5.81 | 16 |
| 26 | LAC | Hard | 97 | 5.79 | 16 |
| 27 | BAL | Hard | 97 | 5.77 | 16 |
| 28 | CAR | Hard | 97 | 5.76 | 16 |
| 29 | CHI | Hard | 96 | 5.75 | 16 |
| 30 | PIT | Hard | 96 | 5.71 | 16 |
| 31 | NYJ | Hard | 95 | 5.66 | 16 |
| 32 | LV | Hard | 95 | 5.64 | 16 |
WR · Rest-of-season schedule
Remaining opponents from week 2 forward — the trade/streaming horizon.
100 = league avg · >100 softer
Easiest rank1ScheduleEasySOS index108Avg opp DvP6.41Games16
Easiest rank2ScheduleEasySOS index106Avg opp DvP6.30Games16
Easiest rank3ScheduleEasySOS index104Avg opp DvP6.23Games16
Easiest rank4ScheduleEasySOS index104Avg opp DvP6.19Games16
Easiest rank5ScheduleEasySOS index103Avg opp DvP6.16Games16
Easiest rank6ScheduleEasySOS index103Avg opp DvP6.16Games16
Easiest rank7ScheduleEasySOS index103Avg opp DvP6.14Games16
Easiest rank8ScheduleEasySOS index103Avg opp DvP6.14Games16
Easiest rank9ScheduleEasySOS index102Avg opp DvP6.11Games16
Easiest rank10ScheduleEasySOS index102Avg opp DvP6.09Games16
Easiest rank11ScheduleAverageSOS index102Avg opp DvP6.09Games16
Easiest rank12ScheduleAverageSOS index102Avg opp DvP6.06Games16
Easiest rank13ScheduleAverageSOS index101Avg opp DvP6.03Games16
Easiest rank14ScheduleAverageSOS index101Avg opp DvP6.01Games16
Easiest rank15ScheduleAverageSOS index100Avg opp DvP5.97Games16
Easiest rank16ScheduleAverageSOS index100Avg opp DvP5.97Games16
Easiest rank17ScheduleAverageSOS index100Avg opp DvP5.96Games16
Easiest rank18ScheduleAverageSOS index99Avg opp DvP5.90Games16
Easiest rank19ScheduleAverageSOS index99Avg opp DvP5.88Games16
Easiest rank20ScheduleAverageSOS index98Avg opp DvP5.86Games16
Easiest rank21ScheduleAverageSOS index98Avg opp DvP5.85Games16
Easiest rank22ScheduleAverageSOS index98Avg opp DvP5.84Games16
Easiest rank23ScheduleHardSOS index98Avg opp DvP5.84Games16
Easiest rank24ScheduleHardSOS index98Avg opp DvP5.83Games16
Easiest rank25ScheduleHardSOS index97Avg opp DvP5.81Games16
Easiest rank26ScheduleHardSOS index97Avg opp DvP5.79Games16
Easiest rank27ScheduleHardSOS index97Avg opp DvP5.77Games16
Easiest rank28ScheduleHardSOS index97Avg opp DvP5.76Games16
Easiest rank29ScheduleHardSOS index96Avg opp DvP5.75Games16
Easiest rank30ScheduleHardSOS index96Avg opp DvP5.71Games16
Easiest rank31ScheduleHardSOS index95Avg opp DvP5.66Games16
Easiest rank32ScheduleHardSOS index95Avg opp DvP5.64Games16
100 = league-average schedule for the position; >100 softer, <100 tougher. sos_index = mean(opponent dvp / league-mean dvp for the position) × 100, so it is comparable across positions.
Pick a position to see per-metric leader cards.
Leaderboards are descriptive. For accountable start/sit calls, see Calls.