
Why: limited usage
vs MIN: allows 19.3 PPR/g to RB, rank 26/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 13 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45% | 0% | 6.1 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 45% | 8% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21% | 0% | 0.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 2 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 26% | 6% | 2.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 15% | 4% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 29% | 7% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 8 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 44% | 5% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | 0.8 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 17% | 6% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 0.1 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6% | 3% | 1.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 19% | 15% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 19% | 5% | 1.3 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 8 | 59 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 4% | 5.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.4 | RB40 (6.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 3.2 | RB61 (2.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 4.7 | RB72 (0.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 3.9 | RB57 (2.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 4.3 | RB60 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 3.3 | RB60 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 2.2 | RB45 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 2.8 | RB66 (0.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 2.1 | RB70 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 2.8 | RB40 (4.4) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade