
Why: limited usage
vs ATL: allows 9.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Bryce Young. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (98/464). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE26), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs ATL in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 2 | 2 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 6% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 14% | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 5 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 18% | 7.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 8 | 7 | 66 | 2 | – | – | 54% | 32% | 25.6 | 22.1 | 18.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 3 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 37% | 14% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 3 | 2 | 47 | 0 | – | – | 47% | 15% | 6.7 | 5.7 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 28% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 3 | 2 | 12 | 1 | – | – | 69% | 10% | 9.2 | 8.2 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 5 | 5 | 78 | 1 | – | – | 58% | 15% | 18.8 | 16.3 | 13.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 4 | 3 | 27 | 2 | – | – | 28% | 16% | 17.7 | 16.2 | 14.7 |
| 2023 W18 | vs | 6 | 5 | 45 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 19% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W17 | vs | 6 | 5 | 51 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 15% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W16 | @ | 5 | 2 | 32 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 19% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W15 | @ | 6 | 4 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 18% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W8 | vs | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 23% | 17% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W7 | vs | 8 | 7 | 98 | 1 | – | – | 82% | 30% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W6 | @ | 7 | 5 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W5 | @ | 11 | 8 | 86 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 37% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Small sample: 9 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade