
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs BUF: allows 7.6 PPR/g to TE, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs BUF in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 | vs | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 44% | 3% | 1.4 |
| 2024 W1 | @ | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 51% | 7% | 1.3 |
| 2023 W18 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W17 | vs | 2 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 51% | 7% | – |
| 2023 W16 | vs | 3 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 25% | 7% | – |
| 2023 W15 | @ | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 25% | 3% | – |
| 2023 W14 | @ | 3 | 3 | 35 | 0 | 75% | 12% | – |
| 2023 W13 | vs | 5 | 3 | 64 | 0 | 75% | 20% | – |
| 2023 W12 | vs | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 43% | 6% | – |
| 2023 W11 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W6 | vs | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 19% | 4% | – |
| 2023 W5 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W4 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W3 | @ | 2 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 18% | 7% | – |
| 2023 W2 | vs | 2 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 18% | 5% | – |
| 2023 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 2 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade