Loading…
Xavier Hutchinson
WR · HOU
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
21.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs BUF: allows 26.5 PPR/g to WR, rank 27/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs BUF
contextvs BUF: 2 games, 3.0 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %79%
Target share32%
Opportunities9
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
104Easy
#2 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
97Average
#20 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
104Easy
#2 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Re-Grading The 2023 NFL Draftnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-11
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs IND | 9 | 5 | 84 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 32% | 13.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ LAC | 3 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 48% | 12% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W16 | vs LV | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 6% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W15 | vs ARI | 2 | 1 | 16 | 0 | – | – | 30% | 8% | 2.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ KC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 40% | 7% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @IND | 5 | 2 | 39 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 16% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 36% | 0% | 0.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ TEN | 5 | 3 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 13% | 7.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs JAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs DEN | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 13% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs SF | 6 | 5 | 69 | 1 | – | – | 71% | 16% | 17.9 |
| 2025 W7 | @ SEA | 4 | 1 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 9% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W5 | @ BAL | 3 | 3 | 18 | 2 | – | – | 67% | 10% | 16.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vsTEN | 3 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 11% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @JAX | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 8% | 4.6 |
| 2025 W2 | vs TB | 3 | 2 | 29 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 13% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W1 | @ LAR | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 68% | 7% | 5.5 |
| 2024 W18 | @TEN | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 7% | 1.5 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim91%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 91%
of 33 Sit calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | IND | SIT | 4.3 | WR17 (13.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | LAC | SIT | 4.2 | WR68 (4.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | LV | SIT | 4.6 | WR111 (1.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | ARI | SIT | 5.4 | WR88 (2.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | KC | SIT | 4.2 | WR139 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | IND | SIT | 4.5 | WR57 (5.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | BUF | SIT | 6.7 | WR92 (0.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | TEN | SIT | 6.6 | WR45 (7.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | JAX | SIT | 8.2 | WR134 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | DEN | SIT | 8.0 | WR57 (6.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade