
Why: limited usage
vs LV: allows 32.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs LV in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 2 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 36% | 6% | 3.8 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 39% | 3% | 1.7 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 22% | 3% | 1.6 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2023 W18 | vs | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 92% | 6% | – |
| 2023 W10 | @ | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 78% | 9% | – |
| 2023 W9 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44% | 3% | – |
| 2023 W8 | vs | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 6% | 3% | – |
| 2023 W6 | @ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 9% | – |
| 2023 W4 | vs | 10 | 9 | 56 | 0 | 63% | 32% | – |
| 2023 W3 | @ | 8 | 5 | 35 | 0 | 59% | 14% | – |
| 2023 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W1 | @ | 6 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 90% | 19% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 7 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade