
Why: limited usage
vs MIA: allows 29.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 19/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W3 | @ | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 3.2 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W7 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W5 | vs | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9% | 5% | 1.9 |
| 2023 W18 | @ | 5 | 4 | 88 | 0 | 46% | 16% | – |
| 2023 W17 | vs | 6 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 84% | 20% | – |
| 2023 W16 | vs | 5 | 3 | 47 | 1 | 68% | 15% | – |
| 2023 W15 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 3% | – |
| 2023 W14 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W7 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W6 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31% | 9% | – |
| 2023 W5 | vs | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 51% | 4% | – |
| 2023 W4 | @ | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 35% | 4% | – |
| 2023 W3 | @ | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 60% | 8% | – |
| 2023 W2 | vs | 3 | 2 | 66 | 2 | 45% | 11% | – |
| 2023 W1 | vs | 3 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 50% | 10% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 3 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade