
Why: limited usage
vs LV: allows 10.1 PPR/g to TE, rank 29/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs LV in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 13.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
No availability flags or recent headlines.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2023 W16 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W13 | vs | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 13% | 5% | – |
| 2023 W12 | @ | 1 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 15% | 3% | – |
| 2023 W11 | vs | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 14% | 3% | – |
| 2023 W9 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W6 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W5 | vs | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 16% | 3% | – |
| 2023 W4 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | – |
| 2023 W3 | vs | 7 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 57% | 24% | – |
| 2023 W2 | @ | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 32% | 7% | – |
| 2023 W1 | vs | 2 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 14% | 10% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 1 graded call. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade