Loading…
Robert Tonyan
TE · PIT
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.4
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs ATL: allows 9.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs ATL
contextvs ATL: 1 game, 7.0 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W17 |  CHI· prior | vs ATL | 4 | 3 | 40 | 0 | 7.0 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %3%
Target share0%
Opportunities0
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
103Easy
#8 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
100Average
#17 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
103Easy
#8 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ LV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs DEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ TEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs IND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @DEN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11% | 2% | 1.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs WSH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vsLV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ JAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs BAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ NYG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W8 | @ LAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 0% | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
22 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 22 Sit calls
Based on 22 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | LV | SIT | -0.2 | TE64 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | DEN | SIT | -0.3 | TE61 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | TEN | SIT | 0.0 | TE66 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | LAC | SIT | 0.4 | TE60 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | HOU | SIT | 0.4 | TE60 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | DAL | SIT | 0.6 | TE63 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | IND | SIT | 0.7 | TE60 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | DEN | SIT | 0.5 | TE52 (1.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | BUF | SIT | 0.5 | TE55 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | WSH | SIT | 0.7 | TE48 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade