Sortable, filterable leaderboards across every tracked metric.
Showing 5 of 56 metrics. Add more from the “Cuts, columns & filters” drawerMetrics rail. Universe = the union of every tracked metric’s leaderboard (top players per metric), merged into one row per player. Blank (·) = outside that metric’s leaders. Widening to the full roster needs a data-export change (tracked separately).
Usage momentum: the slope of snap share, target share, opportunities and red-zone touches over a trailing 4-week window, blended per position. Earliest breakout detector. Noise-guarded descriptive trajectory.
| # | Player | Momentum | Now | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +2.05 | 82%from 41% | 4 wk22 snaps | |
| 2 | +1.89 | 65%from 48% | 4 wk36 snaps | |
| 3 | +1.71 | 61%from 39% | 3 wk25 snaps | |
| 4 | +1.49 | 69%from 57% | 3 wk39 snaps | |
| 5 | +1.33 | 67%from 63% | 4 wk42 snaps | |
| 6 | +1.33 | 79%from 39% | 4 wk28 snaps | |
| 7 | +1.25 | 83%from 81% | 4 wk52 snaps | |
| 8 | +1.18 | 97%from 91% | 4 wk55 snaps | |
| 9 | +1.12 | 77%from 61% | 4 wk39 snaps | |
| 10 | +1.00 | 83%from 92% | 3 wk53 snaps | |
| 11 | +0.93 | 83%from 85% | 4 wk49 snaps | |
| 12 | +0.81 | 93%from 90% | 4 wk60 snaps | |
| 13 | +0.79 | 55%from 69% | 3 wk42 snaps | |
| 14 | +0.73 | 91%from 78% | 4 wk47 snaps | |
| 15 | +0.70 | 42%from 26% | 4 wk16 snaps | |
| 16 | +0.70 | 79%from 30% | 4 wk21 snaps | |
| 17 | +0.68 | 94%from 76% | 4 wk49 snaps | |
| 18 | +0.66 | 71%from 54% | 4 wk40 snaps | |
| 19 | +0.65 | 28%from 28% | 3 wk17 snaps | |
| 20 | +0.63 | 66%from 55% | 3 wk33 snaps | |
| 21 | +0.60 | 38%from 24% | 3 wk17 snaps | |
| 22 | +0.57 | 86%from 75% | 3 wk48 snaps | |
| 23 | +0.51 | 49%from 49% | 4 wk31 snaps | |
| 24 | +0.50 | 92%from 95% | 4 wk60 snaps |
Boards are eligible-only. Every row already clears the noise floor (≥3 played weeks and ≥12 average snaps in the window), so a one-week spike never registers. A trend is descriptive, never a prediction.
Whose passing-game role expanded most — mean team target share over the last three weeks versus the prior three. A descriptive receipt, not a projection.
| # | Player | Baseline → Recent | Δ share pts | Gms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0%23% | +23 | 3 | |
| 2 | 11%28% | +17 | 3 | |
| 3 | 31%47% | +17 | 2 | |
| 4 | 26%40% | +13 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3%16% | +13 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0%13% | +13 | 3 | |
| 7 | 25%37% | +13 | 2 | |
| 8 | 11%24% | +13 | 3 | |
| 9 | 24%36% | +12 | 3 | |
| 10 | 10%22% | +12 | 3 | |
| 11 | 5%17% | +12 | 3 | |
| 12 | 0%12% | +12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 18%29% | +11 | 3 | |
| 14 | 10%21% | +11 | 2 | |
| 15 | 0%11% | +11 | 3 | |
| 16 | 0%11% | +11 | 3 | |
| 17 | 0%10% | +10 | 3 | |
| 18 | 14%25% | +10 | 3 | |
| 19 | 7%17% | +10 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4%14% | +10 | 3 |
Biggest week-over-week climbers in team target share: last 3 weeks vs the prior 3. Who's seeing their passing-game role expand (WR/TE/RB). Δ is the change in mean weekly team target share (percentage points) between the two windows; positive means the role is expanding. Descriptive week-over-week delta, not a prediction.
Targets on 3rd & 4th down — the chain-moving snaps most apps fold into a season total. Flip to Money Downs to see who the offense trusts when it matters; the all-downs target share is the baseline they read against.
Targets on 3rd+4th down — the high-leverage passing situations most apps don't split out: who the offense trusts on money downs. TARGET-based, not routes: tank01 has no routes-run data, so this is money-down target share / yards-per-target, not YPRR/TPRR (see FFM-1560).
Money-down yards per target (3rd+4th): Receiving yards per money-down (3rd+4th) target (min 10 targets): efficiency on the downs that move the chains. TARGET-based, not routes: tank01 has no routes-run data, so this is money-down target share / yards-per-target, not YPRR/TPRR (see FFM-1560).
| # | Player | MD tgts | MD tgt% | MD Y/tgt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 453.5/gm | 34% | 7.6 | |
| 2 | 433.3/gm | 31% | 10.2 | |
| 3 | 413.1/gm | 33% | 7.9 | |
| 4 | 393.0/gm | 33% | 7.2 | |
| 5 | 372.9/gm | 30% | 7.0 | |
| 6 | 373.1/gm | 29% | 7.8 | |
| 7 | 363.0/gm | 35% | 10.7 | |
| 8 | 352.7/gm | 24% | 10.5 | |
| 9 | 342.8/gm | 26% | 4.9 | |
| 10 | 322.7/gm | 31% | 5.3 | |
| 11 | 312.4/gm | 28% | 7.5 | |
| 12 | 312.4/gm | 27% | 6.7 | |
| 13 | 312.6/gm | 33% | 9.9 | |
| 14 | 312.8/gm | 29% | 7.5 | |
| 15 | 312.8/gm | 26% | 8.5 | |
| 16 | 313.1/gm | 30% | 9.4 | |
| 17 | 302.5/gm | 31% | 6.4 | |
| 18 | 292.4/gm | 28% | 9.6 | |
| 19 | 282.5/gm | 22% | 7.9 | |
| 20 | 282.5/gm | 26% | 6.9 | |
| 21 | 282.5/gm | 28% | 6.6 | |
| 22 | 282.8/gm | 26% | 7.0 | |
| 23 | 283.1/gm | 19% | 9.5 | |
| 24 | 272.3/gm | 22% | 6.2 |
Descriptive leaderboard, not a prediction. Money-down = 3rd & 4th down targets from official play-by-play. Yards / target applies a min-target floor (below it: “—”). Target share, not routes: we have no routes-run denominator, so this is not YPRR/TPRR.
Easiest → hardest remaining schedule per team. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate.
| # ▲ | Team | Schedule | SOS index | Avg opp DvP | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Easy | 108 | 6.41 | 16 | |
| 2 | Easy | 106 | 6.30 | 16 | |
| 3 | Easy | 104 | 6.23 | 16 | |
| 4 | Easy | 104 | 6.19 | 16 | |
| 5 | Easy | 103 | 6.16 | 16 | |
| 6 | Easy | 103 | 6.16 | 16 | |
| 7 | Easy | 103 | 6.14 | 16 | |
| 8 | Easy | 103 | 6.14 | 16 | |
| 9 | Easy | 102 | 6.11 | 16 | |
| 10 | Easy | 102 | 6.09 | 16 | |
| 11 | Average | 102 | 6.09 | 16 | |
| 12 | Average | 102 | 6.06 | 16 | |
| 13 | Average | 101 | 6.03 | 16 | |
| 14 | Average | 101 | 6.01 | 16 | |
| 15 | Average | 100 | 5.97 | 16 | |
| 16 | Average | 100 | 5.97 | 16 | |
| 17 | Average | 100 | 5.96 | 16 | |
| 18 | Average | 99 | 5.90 | 16 | |
| 19 | Average | 99 | 5.88 | 16 | |
| 20 | Average | 98 | 5.86 | 16 | |
| 21 | Average | 98 | 5.85 | 16 | |
| 22 | Average | 98 | 5.84 | 16 | |
| 23 | Hard | 98 | 5.84 | 16 | |
| 24 | Hard | 98 | 5.83 | 16 | |
| 25 | Hard | 97 | 5.81 | 16 | |
| 26 | Hard | 97 | 5.79 | 16 | |
| 27 | Hard | 97 | 5.77 | 16 | |
| 28 | Hard | 97 | 5.76 | 16 | |
| 29 | Hard | 96 | 5.75 | 16 | |
| 30 | Hard | 96 | 5.71 | 16 | |
| 31 | Hard | 95 | 5.66 | 16 | |
| 32 | Hard | 95 | 5.64 | 16 |
100 = league-average schedule for the position; >100 softer, <100 tougher. sos_index = mean(opponent dvp / league-mean dvp for the position) × 100, so it is comparable across positions.
Leaderboards are descriptive. For accountable start/sit calls, see Calls.