
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs NE: allows 28.7 PPR/g to WR, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Aaron Rodgers. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (231/514). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR101), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 15.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 6 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 0% | 16% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44% | 5% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 2 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 57% | 7% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 3 | 2 | 35 | 1 | 35% | 11% | 11.5 | 10.5 | 9.5 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 47% | 6% | -0.6 | -1.1 | -1.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 5 | 4 | 74 | 1 | 46% | 16% | 17.4 | 15.4 | 13.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 58% | 6% | 3.7 | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 25% | 4% | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 35% | 7% | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2024 W6 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 12 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 3.8 | WR146 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.1 | WR142 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 6.1 | WR128 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.7 | WR78 (2.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 5.0 | WR32 (11.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 4.6 | WR146 (-0.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 1.9 | WR10 (17.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 2.0 | WR73 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 1.3 | WR88 (2.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 1.0 | WR147 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade