
Why: high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs WSH: allows 34.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 8/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Dak Prescott. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (385/589). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR66), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
The Cowboys have agreed to terms with wide receiver Ryan Flournoy on a one-year contract extension, according to Jordan Schultz of The Schultz Report. Cowboys agree to terms with WR Ryan Flournoy on one-year extension
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 13% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 7 | 5 | 68 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 32% | 11.8 | 9.3 | 6.8 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 2 | 2 | 18 | 1 | – | – | 40% | 7% | 9.8 | 8.8 | 7.8 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 5 | 4 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 64% | 15% | 8.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 13 | 9 | 115 | 1 | – | – | 65% | 28% | 26.5 | 22.0 | 17.5 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 3 | 3 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 8% | 6.4 | 4.9 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | – | – | 43% | 3% | 7.2 | 6.7 | 6.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 2 | 2 | 12 | 1 | – | – | 67% | 6% | 9.2 | 8.2 | 7.2 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 6% | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 28% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 6 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 69% | 19% | 6.3 | 4.8 | 3.3 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 9 | 6 | 114 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 57% | 33% | 18.4 | 15.4 | 12.4 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 23% | 5% | 4.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 3 | 2 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 32% | 7% | 4.1 | 3.1 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 12% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 6% | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 9.7 | WR20 (11.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.8 | WR37 (9.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.9 | WR50 (8.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 5.0 | WR5 (26.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.4 | WR53 (6.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 3.9 | WR137 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 5.5 | WR46 (7.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 8.0 | WR42 (9.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.6 | WR83 (1.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 9.0 | WR152 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade