
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs CLE: allows 26.0 PPR/g to WR, rank 29/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Baker Mayfield. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (358/537). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR89), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs CLE in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 0% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 13% | 5% | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 16% | 5% | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | – | – | 25% | 4% | 0.9 | 0.4 | -0.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 22% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 8% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 4 | 3 | 21 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 86% | 13% | 12.3 | 10.8 | 9.3 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 83% | 11% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 5 | 4 | 42 | 2 | – | – | 83% | 12% | 20.2 | 18.2 | 16.2 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 6 | 5 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 25% | 9.3 | 6.8 | 4.3 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 9 | 4 | 58 | 1 | – | – | 68% | 18% | 15.8 | 13.8 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 3 | 1 | 45 | 1 | – | – | 72% | 13% | 11.5 | 11.0 | 10.5 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 4 | 4 | 59 | 0 | – | – | 36% | 13% | 9.9 | 7.9 | 5.9 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 32% | 3% | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 14% | 3% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 14 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.1 | WR71 (3.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 2.7 | WR78 (3.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 4.6 | WR115 (0.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 6.1 | WR152 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 8.5 | WR138 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 10.1 | WR99 (1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 10.3 | WR25 (12.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 10.4 | WR98 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.9 | WR10 (20.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.9 | WR41 (9.3) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade