
Why: OUT · INJ gate
vs LAR: allows 32.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 12/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jaxson Dart. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (300/499). Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 9 | 8 | 102 | 0 | 84% | 28% | 18.2 | 14.2 | 10.2 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 16% | 3% | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | -2.0 | -2.0 | -2.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38% | 6% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 1 | 1 | 24 | 1 | 7% | 3% | 9.4 | 8.9 | 8.4 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 16 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 1.2 | WR10 (18.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 0.4 | WR86 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 0.9 | WR146 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 1.9 | WR160 (-2.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 1.3 | WR53 (5.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 1.2 | WR128 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 0.8 | WR121 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 0.2 | WR39 (9.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | -0.3 | WR118 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | -0.5 | WR128 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade