Loading…
Savion Williams
WR · GB
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
23.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs MIN: allows 23.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs MIN
contextvs MIN: 1 game, 0.0 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W12 |  GB | vs MIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %4%
Target share0%
Opportunities2
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 12.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
100Average
#14 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
98Average
#19 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
100Average
#14 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Better, worse or the same? A look at the Packers' ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-21
- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
- Offseason report cards for all 32 NFL teams: Our g...www.espn.com · 2026-06-30
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | @ CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4% | 0% | 0.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vsMIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ NYG | 1 | 1 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 4% | 4% | 4.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs PHI | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 6% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs CAR | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 29% | 6% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W8 | @ PIT | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19% | 3% | 7.9 |
| 2025 W7 | @ ARI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 7% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11% | 0% | 0.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ DAL | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12% | 8% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W3 | @ CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 9% | 0% | -0.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vs WSH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 16% | 0% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs DET | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | – | – | 6% | 5% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
10 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 10 Sit calls
Based on 10 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | CHI | SIT | 2.2 | WR114 (0.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | MIN | SIT | 3.3 | WR127 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | NYG | SIT | 2.9 | WR64 (4.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | PHI | SIT | 2.2 | WR81 (2.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | CAR | SIT | 3.1 | WR91 (1.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | PIT | SIT | 1.9 | WR49 (7.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | ARI | SIT | 2.5 | WR135 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W6 | CIN | SIT | 3.1 | WR98 (0.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W4 | DAL | SIT | 2.0 | WR64 (5.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W3 | CLE | SIT | 2.0 | WR164 (-0.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade