Loading…
Pat Bryant
WR · DEN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
19.9
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs KC: allows 27.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 21/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs KC
contextvs KC: 1 game, 13.2 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W11 |  DEN | vs KC | 6 | 5 | 82 | 0 | 13.2 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %66%
Target share22%
Opportunities5
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 15.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#26 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
95Hard
#24 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#26 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- Eight new NFL coach-player pairings Solak can't wa...www.espn.com · 2026-07-14
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs LAC | 5 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 66% | 22% | 7.1 |
| 2025 W16 | vs JAX | 8 | 5 | 42 | 0 | 64% | 17% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ LV | 4 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 47% | 12% | 7.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ WSH | 7 | 3 | 42 | 0 | 70% | 17% | 7.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vsKC | 6 | 5 | 82 | 0 | 56% | 18% | 13.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vsLV | 2 | 1 | 43 | 0 | 49% | 8% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W9 | @ HOU | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 57% | 9% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs DAL | 4 | 2 | 40 | 1 | 56% | 15% | 12.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs NYG | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 51% | 9% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @ NYJ | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 58% | 8% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W5 | @ PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CIN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 2% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ IND | 3 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 24% | 10% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs TEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim85%hit rate
13 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 0%
of 1 Flex call
🔴 92%
of 12 Sit calls
Based on 13 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | LAC | FLEX | 9.4 | WR46 (7.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | JAX | SIT | 8.1 | WR42 (9.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | LV | SIT | 7.7 | WR42 (7.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | WSH | SIT | 7.6 | WR47 (7.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | KC | SIT | 5.8 | WR19 (13.2) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | LV | SIT | 6.3 | WR56 (5.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | HOU | SIT | 4.8 | WR61 (4.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | DAL | SIT | 4.0 | WR30 (12.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | NYG | SIT | 2.7 | WR97 (1.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W6 | NYJ | SIT | 2.6 | WR73 (4.2) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade